3 ms·
That is not what I said at all. Those are your own words. I've already explained in that thread why the "no one would actually pay for" part is false as well,
by roboticmind 6y ago
That is not what I said at all. Those are your own words.
I've already explained in that thread why the "no one would actually pay for" part is false as well, and you are mixing up different things here. No new coins are minted for development, and that is not the primary purpose of Gridcoin at all. Additionally many people do and have run BOINC (what Gridcoin is minted in reward for) without getting any compensation. BOINC existed for 10 years before Gridcoin did.
Further your definition of use case is very different from mine as for instance it excludes for instance using it as a currency for transactions. From what I understand of your definition, you view almost all cryptocurrencies as without any use case. This is different than what it comes across as saying to others here about Gridcoin.
As well I don't work on the coin directly - mostly on the site and wiki. I wouldn't call myself a dev on the coin. As well I haven't requested any Gridcoin from anyone for the work I do on the site if you wanted to talk about the "no one would actually pay for" part of development.
You have continued to say false things about the coin and more and it is quite frankly ticking me off. I'm not normally this frustrated in my responses, but you have continued to pushed my buttons.
I'm not continuing this discussion, but just want to clarify for any others reading this.
- noxer 6y agoYou could not name a single use case in the whole discussion. So there is none. That statement is correct until proven otherwise. The burden of proof lies with you.