robocop

3 ms·

1.
by robocop 14y ago
I don't think this approach would scale, due to the time investment required. It also suffers from making it hard to compare one candidate to another in a fair way, unless you have everyone fix the same bugs. Having a bunch of canned bugs t
2.
by robocop 14y ago
Using the same multipliers for everyone is bound to be sub-optimal, due to Parkinson's law.
3.
by robocop 14y ago
I think a better analogy is Conservative: the existing system must not break! Progressive: we must add new features!
4.
by robocop 15y ago
This individual joined Google in 2009, and left before he'd been there 3 years. He's in no position to be waxing nostalgic about the "good old days" of Google.
5.
by robocop 15y ago
This is a good case for providing state-funded public computer centers, but not such a good case for continuing to fund large collections of books.
6.
by robocop 15y ago
Where are the tests?
7.
by robocop 15y ago
TBH I think you should delete this post. I think I would have been confused had I read it when I was learning harmony theory. Please see http://www.idlewords.com/2005/04/dabblers_and_blowhards.htm .
8.
by robocop 15y ago
I think the convention for chord notation is different to the convention for scale degrees. The 7th note in C major is B, but a C7 has a Bb.
9.
by robocop 15y ago
Sorry to be pedantic, but a 9th chord actually has a 9th and a _flat_ 7th. For example C9 has the notes C-E-G-Bb-D. 9th chords are part of the dominant group, not the major group. A chord with a 9th and a 7th is a _major_ 9th. For example,