robmensching

6 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by robmensching 1y ago

   You really nailed the essence of the idea/solution.
2. 62.▲
   by robmensching 2y ago

   Ahh, the bulk of the negative feedback has been about the draft example EULAs. Those are under review by an actual lawyer (as noted in the `IANAL` note near the top of https://opensourcemaintenancefee.org/maintainers/eu
3. 63.▲
   by robmensching 2y ago

   With all due respect, this is incorrect on both accounts. From the FSF directly: > Free software” means software that respects users' freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute,
4. 64.▲
   by robmensching 2y ago

   This has been fixed and should be live on the site now. If there are any other issues, please feel free to reach out to me via the information at the bottom of this post: https://robmensching.com/blog/posts/2025&#x
5. 65.▲
   by robmensching 2y ago

   That's a good point. The intent was to suggest that if a consumer keeps returning to the project, maybe they should be paying for its maintenance. However, the source code needs to remain freely available, so that part probably goes to