4 ms·
That's a good point. The intent was to suggest that if a consumer keeps returning to the project, maybe they should be paying for its maintenance. However, the
by robmensching 2y ago
That's a good point. The intent was to suggest that if a consumer keeps returning to the project, maybe they should be paying for its maintenance. However, the source code needs to remain freely available, so that part probably goes too far. I will fix it.
- robmensching 2y agoThis has been fixed and should be live on the site now. If there are any other issues, please feel free to reach out to me via the information at the bottom of this post: https://robmensching.com/blog/posts/2025/02/26/introducing-the-open-source-maintenance-fee/ https://robmensching.com/blog/posts/2025/02/26/introducing-t... (I'll also try to keep up with this thread on Hacker News).