robertonoa

3 ms·

1.
by robertonoa 2y ago
While in this collective pipe dream, why not just make it a felony to have unauthorized possession or transmission of this data, make sentencing gravity based on attributes like unsecured, breached, willfully sold, etc?
2.
by robertonoa 2y ago
Yeah, and there is some literature questioning its safety profile. See this disproportionality analysis from a nationwide population-based study of the French (full text, figure 2): https://diabetesjournals.org/care/art
3.
by robertonoa 2y ago
Not a great analogy, as not many people use chemotherapy agents daily, for life (unless you die while taking them, of course) and those can have crippling side effects that are way worse in some populations than simply dying from cancer. &g
4.
by robertonoa 2y ago
> a fine of $1000 paid to each individual per leak would be a good starting point They would just fold the company and start another? Most data brokers do not have 3 trillion dollars.
5.
by robertonoa 2y ago
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36356111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309474/ htt
6.
by robertonoa 2y ago
Can you perform cost benefit analysis in the long term on a drug that has only been used in the short term?
7.
by robertonoa 2y ago
Too simple to state no objective meaning. Individually, agents can craft meanings to their existence, and collectively agents can agree on meanings to their existence. It happens in real life. I mean, even simplistically human life has mean
8.
by robertonoa 2y ago
Something to consider: subjective good isn't objectively good, and objectively good things are hard to locate.