robconery

9 ms·

91.
by robconery 15y ago
I think Star Walk is up there in terms of top apps - most people I know have it installed on their phones and iPads. It's a sensational application.
92.
A Fun Little JSON Murder Mystery With IE 9(wekeroad.com)
10 points by robconery 15y ago|1 comments
93.
by robconery 15y ago
Absolutely true - I'll add that later this week! Edit: Fixed just now.
94.
by robconery 15y ago
If the alternative is "rubbing you the right way"... I'll pass :). If you had the time to be a bit more concrete with your thoughts - it would probably help. I'm not an audio engineer, I'm a developer like you.
95.
Love Your Customers? Maybe You Need To Send Them To Your Competitors(wekeroad.com)
3 points by robconery 15y ago|0 comments
96.
The Mac Is a Great Dev Box(wekeroad.com)
14 points by robconery 15y ago|13 comments
97.
The Mac Is a Great Dev Box(wekeroad.com)
14 points by robconery 15y ago|0 comments
98.
Anatomy of My Screwup: Pushing a Sloppy Podcast(wekeroad.com)
2 points by robconery 15y ago|0 comments
99.
Referencing Routes in ASP.NET MVC The Rails Way(wekeroad.com)
2 points by robconery 15y ago|0 comments
100.
by robconery 16y ago
A very convincing argument.
101.
by robconery 16y ago
It's an HTTP git receiver - nothing magical there
102.
by robconery 16y ago
If you don't mind - let's shift the context :). If you didn't have to use a Build Server to deploy with (in other words you had a competent tool that could deploy, run tasks, etc) - I would assume you'd use that tool. I do understand it's
103.
by robconery 16y ago
I think we'll differ here - but it's a nuance really. In .NET your BuildServer has everything to do with deployment by necessity - that's not the case in other frameworks. It does work, it is convenient, but that's not a Build Server's func
104.
by robconery 16y ago
If you're one person working alone - then yes a "button push" might work for you. For teams of many people that like to push "panic patches" - that doesn't work out so well.
105.
by robconery 16y ago
I don't see how this is "straightforward". You have to have a server that runs TeamCity - which means installing TeamCity and setting up a build config/environment. This is all well and good for most teams - it's needed to keep the team fro
106.
ASP.NET Deployment Needs To Be Fixed(wekeroad.com)
48 points by robconery 16y ago|51 comments
107.
The Wisdom and Magic of Strings(blog.wekeroad.com)
7 points by robconery 16y ago|1 comments
108.
Massive: 400 Lines of Data Access Happiness(blog.wekeroad.com)
1 points by robconery 16y ago|0 comments
109.
by robconery 16y ago
You would be wrong about that. Consider that with MVC you don't have the entire, massive Page Lifecycle thing and a control tree to parse and walk through (decrypting ViewState, assigning control values, and so on). MVC is actually faster
110.
by robconery 16y ago
It does, yes. I don't know if that's a purposeful design consideration or what - but in general that kind of thing in your view is a bad idea. Put it in a helper or drop it in your model.
111.
by robconery 16y ago
Thanks for that - yep forgot the link!
112.
by robconery 16y ago
That page lists a number of startups - sure. It's atomic compared to the startups out there. I do agree - it's impressive to see some of the names on the list and it would be nice to see it grow. All the same, you have to admit that it's ra
113.
by robconery 16y ago
I don't mind having a discussion about this stuff, but calling me a liar is a bit out of bounds. Now - here's the thing: I've said the same thing 5 times, and you refuse to see it - which is that the software isn't free. The dev tools are c
114.
by robconery 16y ago
That's great that it works for you - and I don't think anyone is suggesting it's a bait and switch (I tried to be very careful with the post's wording). My point in this thread isn't that it's duplicitous - more that it's not free. I'm sure
115.
by robconery 16y ago
It's not free - the thing you're not seeing here is that if you don't qualify for the continued "free-ness" of BizSpark (meaning re-upping), then you need to buy an MSDN license and make sure that your dev staff is covered appropriately wit
116.
by robconery 16y ago
Have a read here (I think this is what you're referring to): http://www.bizspark.com/Programs/Pages/GraduationOffer.aspx Note that if you keep your MSDN license, it doesn't entitle you to use much in production. You can't, for instance, r
117.
by robconery 16y ago
I think you might need to go back and read the terms again :). You're given 3 years (for a $100 fee) of what amounts to an MSDN license (which is pretty restrictive) and then you need to pay. If you want to keep the MSDN-type thing (re-uppi
118.
by robconery 16y ago
But it's not free if it's only 3 years - you still have to pay don't you? I'm not arguing the utility of it - I'm wondering if you would have paid anyway - or if the 3 year "loan" made a difference.
119.
by robconery 16y ago
This is interesting - I'm assuming that by "Exchange Integration" you're talking about Calendaring, appointments, and so on yes? I don't get the connection between your use of Exchange and your client's use of Exchange. Put another way - I'
120.
OK Seriously What Is BizSpark?(blog.wekeroad.com)
2 points by robconery 16y ago|0 comments

More ›