rmbyrro

37 ms·

571.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Following this trend, Hans Nieman may well create an "Enhanced Chess" organization
572.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
We live in strange times. Those working to keep chemical cheating away from honest sport competition are the ones called corrupt.
573.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
recipe for death, ultimately
574.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
This is news to me I don't recall having the need to use video to express anything that comes to code. Perhaps user interface stuff, yes. But code? Can't remember...
575.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
It's sad that webdevs ditch web standards in favor of painful implementations, in many cases just for bells and whistles in exchange. What we get is what you described. I wish more editing forms were just a <form method="POST&q
576.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
It doesn't need to have consumer-wide adoption to be a success. They can cater to a niche business market to which UltraRAM can add ultra-high value (pun intended) for particular data processing or persistence needs. One idea that come
577.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
In at least a few of those cancers, there can be other applicable lifestyle changes. Also, patient can get an ultrasound exam (or other applicable) more frequently for an organ that's under a higher risk.
578.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I don't know if that's what you're implying, but I didn't suggest voting for agreement or even that I upvoted because I agree. My comment starts with a disagreement, actually. I said I upvoted because I think it's a
579.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I think it's clear in my comment that I do not agree. I start with that upfront. I upvoted only to counter what I think are unfair downvotes.
580.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I upvoted to counter what I think it's an unfair downvote. I wouldn't upvote if people were not unfairly downvoting. This person has the right to express here and to have their expression viewed by others. If too many people downv
581.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Careful not to fall into a fallacious argument... https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
582.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I don't think this is a political advocacy. It's just a personal expression about a social issue. I found the way it was written quite thoughtful, actually, which I respect (though I don't like in its entirety). But I upvoted
583.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Yes, they say it's scheduled for 3.13. But it seems not confirmed yet (probably still not ready for prime time).
584.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Wouldn't it be relatively trivial for someone to compile, compare checksums and call them out? It's more likely they'd introduce a security flaw that is hard to detect in the OSS code. If someone finds, they'd just claim
585.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
If I have to implement and manage an ACL myself (such a basic feature!!), it's better to go ahead and implement something like min.io and ditch DO entirely.
586.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Certainly a bike helmet. 1. Doesn't do a great job protecting the face or the side of the head; 2. Not designed for motorized vehicles, it can't absorb enough the kind of forces involved in these incidents. You need a full face he
587.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
The minimum requirements for such devices is: - Full face helmet - Knee and elbow pads - Wrist protection with a sliding material on the palm of the hands Ideally, you would also wear a body armor. Neck brace is also desirable, but will not
588.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
It looks like a worthwhile discussion about which you have not yet been able to prepare a reasonably well thought argument to present.
589.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Ever imagined a tech giant with a "don't be evil" mantra? Google is a big company. That's why it has conflicting ideas about privacy... They can't all talk to eachother there! After all, they're not evil, are t
590.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Why was the Apple privacy change so severe to making "the Facebook/Instagram/TikTok to Shopify connection ... dead in the water"? I understand a bit about digital marketing, but not why this was so bad...
591.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
You are right, Chinese govt didn't kill only 1 million. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine The US military complex is beyond dirty and its grip on govt power makes everyone sick in the West and
592.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
There's plenty of evidence that the CCP forces Chinese tech businesses to do surveillance: 1. https://www.google.com/search?q=ccp+chinese+tech+surveillanc... The word you're trying to find is not "speculation
593.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
You are looking at a simplistic perspective. Surveillance doesn't always run 24/7 for every device. The signal/noise ratio would be extremely low. To keep a high ratio, it's selectively switched on for high interest targ
594.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
> the best way to bring peace to the middle east In your view, the best way is no way, then, given the state of endless war in the middle east a long time...
595.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
It depends on the total context of the conversation. As the number of tokens grow, it starts to lose track. Usually it's noticeable and you can remind it of what it's missing.
596.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I was surprised about the quality of this guide. Really thoughtful and well crafted. Goes from solid premises and goals, moving towards practical use of LLMs to accomplish them.
597.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
To me, at least, you and even MBAs that like Unity's behavior are welcome here. It's essential to understand broad perspectives, especially the ones I dislike.
598.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
The thing is: a lot of people want to live in the US. That's not true for China. Have you ever been to China and the US? You may think they're equally awful, but a LOT of people disagree. China's reputation is in really bad s
599.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
No, but US reputation is way better than China's. In the absence of a surveillance-free device, people prefer the one with the better rep.
600.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I'm not saying US tech companies are surveillance-free. What I'm saying is China's reputation is way, waaaaay worse than the US' among people in the West, in general. That's why they prefer American or European tech

More ›