rl3

9 ms·

91.
by rl3 8mo ago
> Any comment that challenges mainstream science ... Stupid mainstream science. > ... and leftist politics ... > ... nor do they see that their views are political in nature. You don't say. Personally, I respect comments th
92.
by rl3 8mo ago
> This community, in large part, is an exception where many members pride themselves on intellectually challenging material. That's not the norm. We're not the norm. I recommend against putting HN on a pedestal. It just leads
93.
by rl3 8mo ago
HR: 1187 at Hunterwasser. Candidate: That's the hotel. HR: What? Candidate: Where I live. HR: Nice place? Candidate: Yeah, sure. I guess. Is that part of the test? HR: No. Just warming you up, that's all.
94.
by rl3 8mo ago
To be fair that still feels like an eternity somehow. Perhaps AI time is the inverse of Valve time.
95.
by rl3 8mo ago
> No, they are not. Doesn’t matter how many LoC; it only take 1 LoC to introduce a vulnerability. So according to you, the concept of attack surface doesn't exist. A 100MB binary is equivalent in risk to a 1KB binary. Got it. If bo
96.
by rl3 8mo ago
It's not a complete agentic setup until your chain of command goes at least nine levels deep.* I want my C-suite and V-suite LLMs to feel like they earned their positions through hard work, values, and commitment to their company. * =
97.
by rl3 8mo ago
Yeah, I just think it's cool when they achieve drop-in compatibility.
98.
by rl3 8mo ago
It's really cool to see projects like this designed for dropping in assets from the proprietary version. The separation in the first place is unfortunate, but at least the capability exists. Civ III in my opinion had some of the best a
99.
by rl3 8mo ago
Yes, the two are very different in that regard. WireGuard is 4k LoC and is very intentional about its choice of using a single, static crypto implementation to drastically reduce its complexity. Technically speaking, it has a lower attack s
100.
by rl3 8mo ago
Your question was this: > So what’s the difference in risk of ssh software vulns and other software vulns? I proceeded to explain how large companies think about the issue and what their rationale is for not exposing SSH endpoints to
101.
by rl3 8mo ago
> That is such consultant distraction-speak. Or how large companies actually think about this risk in the real world. Expose SSH ports to the public internet willy-nilly and count the seconds until their ops and security teams come knoc
102.
by rl3 8mo ago
Good defense is layered. For vulnerabilities, complexity usually equals surface area. WireGuard was created with simplicity in mind. > So, the alternatives to ssh you suggest are all reliant on passwords but ssh, in the case, is based on
103.
by rl3 8mo ago
> ...I quit a job over similar concerns, knowing it would lead to a >70% decrease in comp. Without a significant nest egg or wealth, whether personal or through family. Hey, thanks for doing the right thing.
104.
by rl3 8mo ago
> One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path. It warms my heart to hear that Sam is against authoritarianism. Hopefully he doesn't hang out with anyo
105.
by rl3 8mo ago
Best practices usually call for not exposing the SSH endpoints to the public internet. The principal risk is vulnerabilities in the underlying SSH server implementation. Historically, critical flaws that can compromise you are few and far b
106.
by rl3 8mo ago
It seems to be a common place of residence lately.
107.
by rl3 8mo ago
> File taxes? Sure why not, what could go wrong? "Siri, find me a good tax lawyer." "Your honor, my client's AI agent had no intent to willfully evade anything."
108.
by rl3 8mo ago
The most unrealistic part here is that you're assuming they can even find their desired firmware manager on the org chart. Moreover, most executives don't require blackmail; they tend to go along to get along.
109.
by rl3 8mo ago
One of the more notable examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Nacchio
110.
by rl3 8mo ago
Where's the misleading part? What GP said is true: https://x.com/garrytan/status/1856932483864170606
111.
by rl3 8mo ago
> What would be cool is the dream that's been building for decades about parallel computing abstractions where you write what looks like normal single-threaded CPU code, but it automagically works on SIMD instructions or GPU. I&#x2
112.
by rl3 8mo ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlwwVuSUUfc There's also that possibility.
113.
by rl3 8mo ago
Unfortunately, fully understanding GP's comment requires one having a soul. This is also known as basic empathy in some circles.
114.
by rl3 9mo ago
> Scamming of gambling addicts is tragic but not detrimental to society. It certainly is at scale.
115.
by rl3 9mo ago
> Those links are all political views. Yes, Harvard and The Lancet are just wildly political. > Beyond the veracity of those numbers ... In addition to being incompetent slouches. Unfortunately, we can multiply any given figure by 0
116.
by rl3 9mo ago
YouTube has turned into a trash spigot of AI-generated garbage, especially the ads. Platforms used to care about their advertisers meeting some type of minimum quality bar. It's just trashy. To be fair, said trashiness started prior to
117.
by rl3 9mo ago
> I find it odd to completely disavow someone because you don’t agree 100% with their politics. "politics": https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/usaid-shutdown-has-led-to-hund... https://www.cgdev.org
118.
by rl3 9mo ago
It's almost like there's enough people in the world that we can focus on and tackle multiple problems at once.
119.
by rl3 9mo ago
> And again, it's not the doctors fault that they are incompetent. I don't know how you expect people to take you seriously, but good luck.
120.
by rl3 9mo ago
> Are you joking? No. The human body actually isn't a 737. > This statement you made here is manipulative. You know what I mean by that comparison. Don’t try to spin it like I'm not talking about human lives. Let me spell

More ›