Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rjdavis3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
rjdavis3
7y ago
ChannelApe | Scranton, PA or REMOTE We are looking for experienced Java developers with great organization skills. Our company is huge on automated testing so any experience there is a plus. If anyone is interested please apply here: https
2.
▲
FedEx Customer Passports and IDs Exposed via Public S3 Bucket
(mackeepersecurity.com)
2 points
by
rjdavis3
9y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
Why Amazon DynamoDB isn’t for everyone
(read.acloud.guru)
4 points
by
rjdavis3
9y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
Ask HN: Any good products to allow users to build dashboards within an app?
1 points
by
rjdavis3
9y ago
|
1 comments
5.
▲
by
rjdavis3
9y ago
This is great. I always wondered how blind developers managed to navigate IDEs at a decent pace. I can't help but wonder how Saqib Shaikh navigates through log files for large applications though. Log files usually generate a large amo
6.
▲
by
rjdavis3
9y ago
Have you ever tried it with one of the automated tools? I use Pitest extensively to mutate my Java code bases and found it is not too much slower then regular line and branch code coverage tools when you use a history file so only diffs are
7.
▲
by
rjdavis3
9y ago
I use pitest to run mutation coverage on most of my Java code bases. pitest implements a timeout to check for infinite loops introduced by changing the code. http://pitest.org/faq/
8.
▲
France creates a special visa for entrepreneurs, engineers and investors
(techcrunch.com)
2 points
by
rjdavis3
10y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
by
rjdavis3
10y ago
I would love for them to fix storage of empty string but I don't think that is going to happen given all the documentation they have around not allowing it. Must have been easier for them to just document the limitation. I do agree tha
10.
▲
by
rjdavis3
10y ago
Sorry I saw the link was referencing the Java SDK so I thought you were using the same. The DynamoDBMapper Java SDK has been an easy to use and readable ORM for me. Adding annotations to define keys and attributes has been great. That said
11.
▲
by
rjdavis3
10y ago
I agree they should fix it but I think they have been transparent about the restriction. It is already listed within most of their documentation. http://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/APIReferenc... It
12.
▲
by
rjdavis3
10y ago
While not ideal, you can create a new AttributeTransform that sets a place holder when storing into DynamoDB and removes it when pulling out of DynamoDB as part of your DynamoDBMapper instantiation. I did this to convert some String Sets (S
13.
▲
by
rjdavis3
10y ago
What is the point of this trending? To try and get AWS to fix it? I must admit this was a gotcha for me at first but it is documented right on their standard Limits page. I'm guessing the fix is non-trivial or they probably would have