rishi_rt

4 ms·

1.
by rishi_rt 11mo ago
You might also like Reason and Less by Vinod Goel (MIT Press). He talks about human behavior being an outcome of 4 systems - autonomous, instinctive, associative and reasoning with evolutionary newer systems like reasoning and associative t
2.
by rishi_rt 11mo ago
https://wii-film.antikythera.org/ - This is a 1-hour talk by the author which summarizes what seems to be the gist of the book. I haven't read the book completely. I read a few sections. Personally, I think the book do
3.
by rishi_rt 11mo ago
There's also the whole predictive processing camp in cognitive science whose position is loosely similar to the author's, but the author makes a much stronger commitment to computationalism than other researchers in the camp.
4.
by rishi_rt 11mo ago
Interesting. N.J. Enfield (Linguist, Anthropologist) makes a similar point about the purpose for which language evolved for in "Language vs Reality". I'm paraphrasing loosely, but the core argument is that the primary role of
5.
Life beyond the free energy principle: how to survive without invariance(dialecticalsystems.eu)
1 points by rishi_rt 1y ago|0 comments
6.
by rishi_rt 1y ago
Aravind Narayanan seems to be the only guy qualified enough to be called an expert.
7.
by rishi_rt 1y ago
This article presumes that the usage scenario has been defined already (by a PM) and the designer is just creating visual representations to enact the said scenario. In that sense, the article seems to attempt to answer what should a devel
8.
by rishi_rt 1y ago
Another paper that echoes similar concerns — AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11360 )
9.
by rishi_rt 1y ago
Such checklist/rule based approaches do not help anyone. Trying to understand why the said rules work from the standpoint of visual perception is much more beneficial in the long run. Designing with the Mind in Mind by Jeff Johnson (of
10.
by rishi_rt 5y ago
This is very true