rijoja

7 ms·

31.
by rijoja 1y ago
> "And if as a CIO you believe that your prohibition on using LLMs for coding because of 'divulging company secrets' holds, you are either strip searching your employees on the way in and out, or wilfully blind." Righ
32.
by rijoja 1y ago
Yes so why would you spend tons of time and introduce a huge amount of technical debt by rewriting the boring parts, instead of just using a ready made off the shelf solution in that case. You'd think that there be someone who'd b
33.
by rijoja 1y ago
It's not the exact opposite*, the author said that if you're doing boilerplate _code_ it's probably fine. The thing is that since it can't think, it's absolutely useless when it comes to things that hasn't been
34.
by rijoja 1y ago
yes
35.
by rijoja 1y ago
That might be true, but it doesn't disprove the fact that this is happening, does it?
36.
by rijoja 2y ago
Won't you just get shitty clients if you write shitty posts if you excuse my french
37.
by rijoja 2y ago
Leaving children unattended with random strangers is bad parenting this should be obvious to anyone.
38.
by rijoja 2y ago
What makes you believe that just because there is X percent of category 1 in set A it is "unjust" if there is not X percent of category 1 in an unrelated set B? Also why do you think this principle applies to the categories Women
39.
by rijoja 2y ago
I suppose because Matlab is a language designed for math, compared to C which is designed as a low level systems language. Julia would be more or less an open source equivalent of Matlab. It seems that the code was translated from Fortan to
40.
by rijoja 2y ago
I'm sure the thought has crossed their mind already.
41.
by rijoja 2y ago
Do you think murders are prone to telling people what they done, to make sure that there is solid and accurate statistics, for the benefit of mankind?
42.
by rijoja 2y ago
Idk if you think someone owes you 4 billion, maybe you'd start thinking about not letting it slide, and make an example out of him. His co-defendant, did within a few days as well, which is interesting. People die for a lot less, and i
43.
by rijoja 2y ago
It's not that a huge part of their business-idea is, and has been to build machines designed to kill large amounts of people either.
44.
by rijoja 2y ago
Right so Mike Lynch was in a huge legal case in the US, and ran a company that was large at least by UK standards, which meant that his action affected thousands of people, making this noteworthy.
45.
by rijoja 2y ago
A few people working for boeing met early unexpected ends as well...
46.
by rijoja 2y ago
> Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP or LiFePO4) battery This should be "Lithium Ion Phosphate...", right?
47.
by rijoja 2y ago
The name WiPhone sort of hints at that though, doesn't it? Obviously the title for the HN post doesn't include that.
48.
by rijoja 2y ago
That's interesting, I know that other countries do the same, however, but I was thinking about it as a general principle.
49.
by rijoja 2y ago
> You mean by taxing labour and taxing commerce? > Sorry for the snark, but come on... > The Roman empire was built on never taxing labour, because that was seen as an atrocity (never mind the slavery). Instead they taxed luxury go
50.
by rijoja 2y ago
idk, maybe because their parents liked them? Do you really want to incentivize against people working hard to make sure their offspring, has a good life? Also a family-home might have sentimental value, and this really doesn't only app
51.
by rijoja 2y ago
Could you please tell us which ones?
52.
by rijoja 2y ago
> And then, even when faced with implementing a huge, audit critical, distributed append-only store, the thing they tell us blockchains are so useful for, they just use normal database tech like the rest if us. With one centralized infr
53.
by rijoja 2y ago
Yeah but if women go to work, the amount of available workers will more or less double, so if you where to apply the theory of supply and demand you'll find that this will make wages decrease, which is very good for extremely rich peop
54.
by rijoja 2y ago
Nice straw man there, my point is that he failed to instantiate any failures, so it seems very manipulative. He could have for instance have used that link to verify, and I wouldn't have been thought that it was weird that he said that
55.
by rijoja 2y ago
arm
56.
by rijoja 2y ago
What I am saying that if someone starts out with a lot of unsubstantiated and vaguely defined posturing with the conclusion that the leaders of one of the most hands down successful and interesting open source projects in recent years, the
57.
by rijoja 2y ago
Right right, so you'll need money from somewhere, and the people who has money aren't necessarily moral, is that what you are getting at? Wouldn't the thing be that the reason that they needed to get sponsorship in the first
58.
by rijoja 2y ago
Right but the people complaining doesn't seem to think that an "underdocumented custom functional programming language", is a design flaw. So given those assumptions, why don't they fork it? Also when you say that the va
59.
by rijoja 2y ago
So why not fork the project?
60.
by rijoja 2y ago
I think in terms of etiquette the best way to deal with disagreement of how an open source project would be to fork the project instead of trying to take over it.

More ›