Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
righttoolforjob
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
4y ago
Exactly. It is fine to call it "source available" or something.
62.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
4y ago
Doesn't exist.
63.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
4y ago
I think you just have to bite the bullet and document what you have. Start with the high-level view from different perspectives. Some call it different architectural views, like block diagrams and data flows. Focus on diagrams and a little
64.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
4y ago
What do you mean? When converting real money to...?
65.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
4y ago
Except that is mostly printed money. You can't take the crypto market cap seriously. If a significant portion of it tries to get converted from "magic internet money" to real money the price will plummet.
66.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
4y ago
Good that you started then! I can give you two small pieces of feedback: - use the _s variants of the string manipulations, since they are safer and protect against buffer overflows, e.g sprintf_s - perhaps poll more often, but only print w
67.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
4y ago
Just cook something instead, I guess? Helps to have some food at home ready to be cooked. Go for simple dishes like pancakes or fried eggs if your current skill level is kind of low.
68.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
Except you don't actually believe it, so it's a lie, not an opinion.
69.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
I suppose it should be a regulator representing the public then.
70.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
I understand it a bit differently. They could not remove the clause (as they do not dictate the license), so the clause stays. The software is thus licensed the same way as the original repo and neither can be called open source. Whoever su
71.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
Who is getting sued here? The post mentions Neo4j in the initial paragraph, but then it shifts to talking about someone who tried to promote their fork as open source. Shouldn't Neo4j be sued as well for falsely claiming to be open sou
72.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
It's because when someone means bike, they say bike.
73.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
That is good advice! I got the same from my first manager: Research and try to find the answer first before reaching out for help. I had in fact already done that in the particular situation in which he commented, but he was right in princi
74.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
That's not true. If you read what Google wrote regarding BeyondCorp the argument is that firewalls and VPNs were perimeter defences for weak internal networks and this is the main complaint, that breaching this defence would allow late
75.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
I was in this exact situation together with many colleagues. Just leave. It sucks that you have to leave what you've invested, but it's a fallacy to think that it will get better. The project manager needs to be punished and you n
76.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
I read this through a completely different lens. The people I've seen with this type of behaviour have been bitter or incompetent leads or managers. I too wished they would take a long hike of a short bridge, but chose to leave the com
77.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
Zero trust is about not trusting anything, which means neither external nor internal network. Not trusting the internal network does not mean that you should open it up to everyone. You have misunderstood this gravely. Google doesn't d
78.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
Thanks Ivan I've thoroughly enjoyed the previous version.
79.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
They're also (intentionally?) misrepresenting the memo. > MFA should be integrated at the application layer, such as through an enterprise identity service as described above, rather than through network authentication (e.g., a virt
80.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
> What do you disagree with? The main thing I'm disagreeing with is undefining what CAP means. CAP is a very particular proof and the rest I think perhaps we need a new name for. > CAP has a long history and was originally provid
81.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
Looks like a pretty bad paper, to be honest.
82.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
Have to disagree here. In CAP C means linearizable, meaning the operation happens somewhere in the time between you sending the request and receiving the response. That's why you have to select between C or A, because in the presence o
83.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
What if you were economically harmed both by Google and Apple? Do you have any real alternatives left?
84.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
I think the same thing should apply, but it's just not as harmful to society currently, because it's just one platform among many, many others, and it's just for games. Whatever the proper regulation is to counter this, it mi
85.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
> none of the parties mentioned in the original issue are 'wanting to do good' in my opinion Yes, for the immediate issue at hand they just want to make money right, but they might be seeing their greater mission as extremely g
86.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
Yes, all "evil" should be eliminated. I don't think they're evil in the sense of Hitler or anything like that, they've just learned to play by the current rules and maximize their power under them. I don't thin
87.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
Yep, regulation is way behind. None of this lockdown is for the public good and thus it should not exist. The demand side of the market doesn't seem to be able to balance this out (i.e. vote with your wallet, stop buying the products,
88.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
I don't think you need to be 100% anti-capitalist to see the harm. It's a bit of a false dichotomy. A purely liberal capitalist market is bad, so is communism, so what? A market is a highly dynamic non-linear system that nobody fu
89.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
Millions of service users use it to interact with perhaps millions of service providers in an app market. That's infrastructure.
90.
▲
by
righttoolforjob
5y ago
> I don't, for a minute, think that the 30% would not be paid by the end-user if Evil Corp A was not in play. B and C would just raise prices. That's what I hint at with "basic economic theory". Evil Corp X wants maxi
More ›