3 ms·
I understand it a bit differently. They could not remove the clause (as they do not dictate the license), so the clause stays. The software is thus licensed the
by righttoolforjob 5y ago
I understand it a bit differently. They could not remove the clause (as they do not dictate the license), so the clause stays. The software is thus licensed the same way as the original repo and neither can be called open source.
Whoever sued these folks for false advertising should sue Neo4j as well.
- thayne 5y agoBut isn't Neo4j suing Graph Found? Why would Neo4j sue themselves?
- righttoolforjob 5y agoI suppose it should be a regulator representing the public then.