riffic

41 ms·

661.
by riffic 3y ago
you don't understand the power of the Lindy effect. All of the dated infrastructure we have now has ultimately survived the test of time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect by the way DNS is wonderful.
662.
by riffic 3y ago
ugh no
663.
by riffic 3y ago
they can submit an I-D if it were so desired: https://www.rfc-editor.org/pubprocess/#:~:text=Anyone%20can%... .
664.
by riffic 3y ago
plus you're not sticking the ActivityPub protocol genie back inside its bottle.
665.
by riffic 3y ago
I hope the Bluesky PBLLC will submit their "AT protocol" to the ietf as an rfc. we already have an existing protocol though
666.
by riffic 3y ago
I don't think they even have anything (note I am purely speculating) beyond a single ec2 instance at the moment. it's going to take a lot of time to scale the necessary infra to support the demand
667.
by riffic 3y ago
this process (neutron capture and decay) contributes to only a small amount of magnesium in the reactor coolant, as the probability of neutron capture by sodium-23 is relatively low compared to other reactions involving the reactor's f
668.
by riffic 3y ago
always been partial to "flip a bitch" https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flip_a_bitch
669.
by riffic 3y ago
in general they're either labors of love or they run on a donation basis. it's a really good question.
670.
by riffic 3y ago
ads, vc, data harvesting and brokerage, managed services (hosting, infra) on a subscription model offered to orgs? the ethical model is obviously ActivityPub tho adding more than snark to my reply: I want to know if the PBLLC intends to sub
671.
by riffic 3y ago
it's still in doubt who exactly owns bluesky pbllc, but there has been some discussion and the claim is that it is owned by "the team" (which is vague and doesn't specify who or quantify how much stake is held by a sha
672.
by riffic 4y ago
40 licenses, 441 members (6 are non-voting). Not sure how they intend to make this work but the article has some obtuse phrasing like: > The chatbot won’t be able to run within the House of Representatives’ internal server, which has a f
673.
by riffic 4y ago
link for reference: https://litepub.social/
674.
by riffic 4y ago
Devo's first live show was in 1975 opening for Sun Ra and things were chaotic : https://www.reddit.com/r/Music/comments/15k9kf/devo_hired_as...
675.
by riffic 4y ago
jump ship
676.
by riffic 4y ago
one way it's not done is with DNS
677.
by riffic 4y ago
it's a CP/M relic of i'm not mistaken https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP/M
678.
by riffic 4y ago
verification has always been arbitrarily bestowed on Twitter users.
679.
Can ActivityPub Save the Internet?(theverge.com)
12 points by riffic 4y ago|0 comments
680.
by riffic 4y ago
it's certainly a fashion crime
681.
by riffic 4y ago
names are not that easy though. https://shinesolutions.com/2018/01/08/falsehoods-programmers...
682.
by riffic 4y ago
would love to see some analysis here for solutions at a protocol level (W3C ActivityPub, Bluesky pbllc AT protocol, nostr etc) as a way to prevent nation-states from imposing this kind of control over a specific service.
683.
by riffic 4y ago
it's fair to note that the Fediverse is much older than the AP protocol. It originally came up through a duo of protocols, OStatus and the Diaspora protocol. Before Mastodon we had Status.net, Identi.ca, and GNU Social. The Fedi will b
684.
by riffic 4y ago
PDT lol
685.
by riffic 4y ago
ask chatgpt to digest it for you lol. otherwise all you'll hear is technobabble perhaps try WordPress out with the ActivityPub plugin?
686.
by riffic 4y ago
the AP ecosystem is a genie that can't be placed back inside the bottle, it can not be bought by a single malicious actor (or nation-state), and it was built openly by folks associated by the W3C as a standard specification for anyone
687.
by riffic 4y ago
daylight time would be correct for this time of year
688.
by riffic 4y ago
Corruption, plainly put in New York parlance, " f you, that's why."
689.
by riffic 4y ago
it was annoying to me to type it too! There are also webfinger URLs that serve the same purpose like https://mastodon.social/@gargron == @gargron@mastodon.social
690.
by riffic 4y ago
that's not a finger lol

More ›