Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ridewinter
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
The article's main example of an AI fail is YouTube's recommendation engine optimizing for extremist content. But it didn't seem to explain how "inverse reinforcement learning" would solve it - don't people
62.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
I'm reminded about 30 times a day when dismissing a cookie popup of the stupidness of EU regulations. When considering the lifetimes wasted recreating that popup on countless websites, I'm ready to go full Libertarian.
63.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
The common trope is that European price controls hinder innovation in pharmaceuticals [1]. I've read that American pharmaceutical firms spend 4x in R&D per capita than European counterparts. Counterpoints? [1] https://ww
64.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
How is Starship related to Brilliant Pebbles? It's Starlink that seems to prove that you can put a constellation of satellites in the tens of thousands affordably. That's the type of coverage that Brilliant Pebbles needs to succ
65.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
This article is what Karl Popper would call historicism — the idea that history has fixed laws or trends that inevitably lead to certain outcomes. Here's an article on why he considered it false and even dangerous: https://
66.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
As wild as it sounds, parallel universes are IMO the best way to explain a quantum computer. I posted an article about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21337739
67.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
One way of viewing Google's achievement is as a result that cannot be explained without invoking parallel universes. That's pretty amazing. I posted an article explaining more: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=
68.
▲
The Quantum Computer Explained Using the Multiverse
(medium.com)
3 points
by
ridewinter
7y ago
|
0 comments
69.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
As the current American President has shown, treaties and obligations only go so far. That destruction of trust may be the most lasting damage that he causes.
70.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
Nice, concise & persuasive article. Do you think the political environment in the Bay Area is ripe for it?
71.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
No one discussing UBI as a nation-wide comprehensive solution here?
72.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
There's a decent chance we're now at peak noise. EVs and self driving cars that don't honk their horns becoming more and more ubiquitous. Someday electric trucks. Better appliances. Silent discos becoming more and more popula
73.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
The church in the small Swiss town I lived in rang its bell every 15 minutes , even in the middle of night. Maybe the locals find it comforting. It kept me up.
74.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
I encourage everyone pessimistic about our future to learn about David Deutsch's infinite optimism: https://youtu.be/lX-K63pVPTM
75.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
Owning a car is necessary for daily life. And your backyard pool will not impact the rest of society.
76.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
Owning a gun makes it 2-3x more likely someone in your family will die by a gun. So it makes you less safe, not more. https://slate.com/technology/2015/01/good-guy-with-a-gun-myt... And it definitely makes it
77.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
Yes, Churchill said plenty of stuff that was racist/misogamist even back in those days. Bojo models himself after him. Btw I'm a big Churchill fan in spite of all that. The flawed hero.
78.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
It was a leaked document, nothing official yet. But this is massive news. Saying it doesn’t matter because there’s no practical uses is like the people discounting the Wright Brothers because the airplane could only fly for a minute.
79.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
Can you explain how qbits work then? How exactly do they take on multiple values at the same time?
80.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
FWIW, after 15 years of consistent practice, mediation to me is simply isolating yourself so that you have no escape from the dramas in your mind. You eventually simply become bored of them and that liberates all kinds of creative energy
81.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
We tend to find solutions for resource scarcity. eg. Tesla dramatically reducing its cobalt usage. https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-3-batteries-cobalt-vol...
82.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
MWI provides a clear, comprehensive explanation for all of the “weird” quantum phenomenon. Beyond that, this quote from FoR [1] convinced me: “To those who still cling to a single-universe world-view, I issue this challenge: explain how Sho
83.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
I remember the information chaos, the car radio said that the towers came down and passenger planes were being shot down by the military. I was in tears. What a day.
84.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
Pretty sure what I’m saying is to use the dang fire hydrant in addition to removing unnecessary wood from the cathedral.
85.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
Not “technology will save us” - human creativity can save us. It has in the past and survival will require our creativity infinitely into the future. You may laugh but let’s tslk again in 30 years. When avg temps rise more than the 1 degree
86.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
Yes, we’ve always used technology to alter our environments and we’ll need to continue to do so. The explanations in the doomsday articles here assume no technological progress. We’ve only put minimal effort into geo-engineering solutions,
87.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
The soviet naval officer who prevented WWIII: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2016/03/you-and-almo... The British government on the brink of capitulating to Hitler: https://www.historyextra
88.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
There’s the multiple population bottlenecks in our DNA history [1]. The close calls in world wars and cold wars. Etc. 1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842629/
89.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
Earth has always been uninhabitable for the most part. It’s only technology that allows us to live where we are (unless you live in the great Rift Valley). And it will be technology that saves us in the future. Edit: downvoted for technolog
90.
▲
by
ridewinter
7y ago
No, we’ve been on the brink of annihilation many times and have found a way through. We cannot predict what new knowledge will be discovered to solve these problems. But we must keep trying.
More ›