ricknew

6 ms·

1.
by ricknew 7y ago
This is a very interesting exploration. If more folks explored dialogue in this type of setting, new forms of communication could possibly emerge. Also might be relevant here https://hoursofidleconversation.wordpress.com/ess
2.
by ricknew 8y ago
Read Donna Haraway, "Staying With the Trouble" for one take on how we can respond.
3.
by ricknew 10y ago
> thus fitness functions are useless." or perhaps: thus fitness functions should be taken seriously, but not literally?
4.
by ricknew 10y ago
Two points in the article that stand out for me are: 1. it’s a logical flaw to think that if we have to take it seriously, we also have to take it literally. That literalness narrows us, keeps us in the confines of language. Seriousness let
5.
by ricknew 11y ago
Thanks. You can reach me at ricknew@firstandunion.com
6.
by ricknew 12y ago
No usability testing?
7.
by ricknew 12y ago
Awesome, thank you!
8.
by ricknew 12y ago
How about various angles views of a tennis court that is no longer in much use as originally intended? Maybe no nets or deteriorating nets, lines barely there, the play of life on the court. Could include people using the court in unusual
9.
by ricknew 12y ago
Bertrand Russell goes into this question in some depth. http://www.ditext.com/russell/russell.html
10.
1992 Deleuze: production, enclosure toward control [pdf]
1 points by ricknew 13y ago|0 comments
11.
by ricknew 13y ago
>> At the end of the day, this guy - of his own will - decided to harm others by the multitudes << Perhaps a relevant post: http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/life-without-free-will
12.
by ricknew 14y ago
The pitch could be shorter, but it got me to sign up. Democratic debate seems to nuanced to be classified as For/Against. Dialog takes a back seat here as you have to drill down to another layer of for or against. Is there some inspiration
13.
by ricknew 14y ago
How will your email flow get lighter? :-)
14.
by ricknew 14y ago
Looks like it might be a great tool. However, it seems like it might be a bit complex. This seeming complexity is accentuated because of the "lighter" expectation created by the name. Why is it called "lightermail"?
15.
by ricknew 14y ago
This excerpt from Shunryu Suzuki might add another approach to the conversation. http://www.kingstonkendo.org/mistakesinpractice.pdf (PDF)
16.
by ricknew 15y ago
What kind of help are you looking for? What type of job is it?
17.
by ricknew 15y ago
You're welcome. Good luck and maybe post back with any updates.
18.
by ricknew 15y ago
Portfolio and overall design is really nice. Clean, modern, easy to read. The in-page hyperlinks are a bit disconcerting. I'm not exactly sure if I've gone to a new page or where I am. I don't like feeling lost. Since I can scroll maybe the
19.
by ricknew 15y ago
The technology is cool and it works like a charm. However, the approach of using "mystery meat" navigation for an entire website is pretty tedious for this visitor.
20.
by ricknew 15y ago
You could consider stopping at "Description of deliverables", then pay the prospective development team to help refine the deliverables spec/scope and on that basis create the additional items. You might also consider including a couple of