richardw

16 ms·

211.
by richardw 2y ago
That’s an excellent use for an AI generated TL;DR.
212.
by richardw 2y ago
Any state actor who puts in the effort can get pretty good, and some countries make a very specific effort in this area. North Korea is one. Imagine the brightest people in your state (say, population 26 million) were all nudged into one ve
213.
by richardw 2y ago
Sorry dang. Emotions.
214.
by richardw 2y ago
[flagged]
215.
by richardw 2y ago
This kind of thing is why I think Sam is often misjudged. You can’t fuck around in such a competitive market. If you go in all kumbaya you’ll get crushed by market forces. It’s rare for company/founder ideals to survive the market inde
216.
by richardw 2y ago
Thank you!
217.
by richardw 2y ago
I’ve seen his stuff referenced many times but it’s paywalled, right? Is there an email sub without the paywall?
218.
by richardw 2y ago
(Therefore, this has a one-way function of improving the status of haunted domains and why I think anything is better than nothing unless it blocks a better strategy.)
219.
by richardw 2y ago
That seems to be the same goal for https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page Do you mean something different, e.g. not just structured data?
220.
by richardw 2y ago
If the top "scandals" in the article are considered reasons to change, just wait until the alt-crew get a hold of wikipedia. Medical, political, science, education, religion discussions would all be even more crazy when people can
221.
by richardw 2y ago
The parents rules seemed to indicate only reevaluating the status of a haunted domain. I see nothing about evaluating a normal domain.
222.
by richardw 2y ago
Well, current approach guarantees you’re getting screwed over. Any improvement is beneficial unless it blocks a better approach?
223.
by richardw 2y ago
Then he can claim those things, but not what he hasn’t done yet. He’s very capable and I’m happy to defend his contribution, but his pronouncements on “full self driving” have been untruthful. It is not full self driving. It was not autopil
224.
by richardw 2y ago
Drag in a couple files and say “make a class that does X but use this format”. I absolutely don’t rely on it for lots of things but it’s absolutely capable of working with existing code. Claude is far better than OpenAI when dealing with se
225.
by richardw 2y ago
My guess: because many want an alternative to X and hope one of them will reach escape velocity/good enough UX etc. This is firmly a chicken and egg situation but as long as there’s progress and growth, there is still a chance.
226.
by richardw 2y ago
Maybe record that amazing commute so the less fortunate train travelers can play it on an Apple Vision Pro? Bit of a rubbish arrival surprise at work, but we can solve that next!
227.
by richardw 2y ago
I spent some time blocking a ton of them a couple weeks ago and it seems to have dropped off. There should be an app to automate that. There probably is.
228.
by richardw 2y ago
I’ve had a lot of good looking ladies with thousands of follows and very few followers, take an interest in my extremely non-influencer like rambling. I call BS on his growth. Maybe there’s growth in pockets, like those who love his politic
229.
by richardw 2y ago
I assume it’s embrace, extend, extinguish: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extingu...
230.
by richardw 2y ago
Excellent move to juice the stock price but it’s not profit. I think it’s more a hope for profit one day, a ticket to the game.
231.
by richardw 2y ago
I tend to iterate and limit the output by eg saying “make the smallest change possible, don’t rewrite the file, tell me what you want to do first” etc. It seems to respond well to change requests, with much apology. ChatGPT berates me about
232.
by richardw 2y ago
No I just drag files in, at least when I'm working with IntelliJ. Sluggish but works. With VSCode I've used Copilot but still break multi-file tasks out to Claude. I’m sure the eg Cursor workflow is better but it hasn’t bitten for
233.
by richardw 2y ago
So much of my workflow has moved to Claude. I haven’t quite got into Cursor, and find CoPilot fine for simple autocomplete but I don’t want bigger changes until I’ve checked them. In fact I usually heavily slow down efforts by insisting on
234.
by richardw 2y ago
Why are there no class actions to take politicians to task for spreading life risking lies? It seems like a slam dunk in such a litigious society.
235.
by richardw 2y ago
That thing is amazing. I suspect optimised for shorter distance and dynamism, whereas I think the 280 is basically a faster helicopter that can cruise longer distance? Not expert, just wondered about the tradeoffs given the relatively bad s
236.
by richardw 2y ago
I’d think a variation (vary size, shape to suit task) of this with weapons would do well, since it’ll already be replacing the black hawk. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_V-280_Valor
237.
by richardw 2y ago
If you’re reaching for nukes and asteroids then I think you just want to argue. Have a nice day.
238.
by richardw 2y ago
> What Half of the language in your comment was fact free and incendiary. Delusion, prattle, deep needs of some role. That’s all firmly in the realm of ad hominem, so I was asking if you had anything substantial. > I'd wager the
239.
by richardw 2y ago
Do you have any points that aren’t about the people you disagree with? Argue the facts. What are the limits that prevent progress on the dimension of replicating human intelligence?
240.
by richardw 2y ago
I’m not sure, but it’s possible Stephen Hawking would have been fine with becoming digital, assuming he could keep all the traits he valued. He had a pretty low data communication rate, interacted digitally and did more than most humans can

More ›