4 ms·

So much of my workflow has moved to Claude. I haven’t quite got into Cursor, and find CoPilot fine for simple autocomplete but I don’t want bigger changes until

So much of my workflow has moved to Claude. I haven’t quite got into Cursor, and find CoPilot fine for simple autocomplete but I don’t want bigger changes until I’ve checked them. In fact I usually heavily slow down efforts by insisting on design discussions first, and either continue, abandon/restart chat and/or write code myself and come back when the I think the issue is LLM-friendly. But Claude works for me and edits multiple files at once, which I check. I use ChatGPT (o1 or 4o) when I don’t want to impact my Claude quota or when I think a single file change is tricky. It’s personality is now too annoying. So often it doesn’t even look at the code in multiple files I’ve uploaded, it just starts shooting off code and I have to say “look at the code”. What improvements am I missing? Honest question.

sha16 2y ago
I think Claude trades quality for speed. From what I've seen it starts generating almost immediately even with a large token window. For smaller changes it is usually good enough, but larger changes are where I bump into issues as well. I'll stick to using change [somefunction] rather than change entire file.
- richardw 2y ago
  I tend to iterate and limit the output by eg saying “make the smallest change possible, don’t rewrite the file, tell me what you want to do first” etc. It seems to respond well to change requests, with much apology. ChatGPT berates me about its own code and keeps saving shit I don’t want in memory, so I have to go back and clean up stuff like "Is testing Lambda functions directly in the AWS web console" and "Is working with testing and integration test fixtures in their software projects" when those are 2 of 100 things I'm doing. I'm using SAM for lambda, I might have run one in the console to bypass the API and now it's saved it as gospel. Half the benefit with LLM's is that they forget context when you start a new chat, so you can control what it focuses on.
deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
baudpunk 2y ago
Cursor is so good.
dghlsakjg 2y ago
What are you using to get your code into Claude. Continue, or something similar?
- smuser 2y ago
  I really like using aider (https://aider.chat https://aider.chat) and heavily leverage the /ask command to have a quick chat on intent and context before prompting it for the code I need.
  - rmbyrro 2y ago
    Aider feels like magic
- richardw 2y ago
  No I just drag files in, at least when I'm working with IntelliJ. Sluggish but works. With VSCode I've used Copilot but still break multi-file tasks out to Claude. I’m sure the eg Cursor workflow is better but it hasn’t bitten for me yet. I also tried Replit and it felt amazing, but quickly got into a place it couldn't escape and it felt like it took too much effort to get it to change direction once it had committed to a plan. This was early, so it's almost definitely better by now.
algo_trader 2y ago
is copilot improving behind the scenes ? I assume you get the latest model, plus some goodies that GH is working on

sha16 2y ago

I think Claude trades quality for speed. From what I've seen it starts generating almost immediately even with a large token window. For smaller changes it is usually good enough, but larger changes are where I bump into issues as well. I'll stick to using change [somefunction] rather than change entire file.

richardw 2y ago
I tend to iterate and limit the output by eg saying “make the smallest change possible, don’t rewrite the file, tell me what you want to do first” etc. It seems to respond well to change requests, with much apology. ChatGPT berates me about its own code and keeps saving shit I don’t want in memory, so I have to go back and clean up stuff like "Is testing Lambda functions directly in the AWS web console" and "Is working with testing and integration test fixtures in their software projects" when those are 2 of 100 things I'm doing. I'm using SAM for lambda, I might have run one in the console to bypass the API and now it's saved it as gospel. Half the benefit with LLM's is that they forget context when you start a new chat, so you can control what it focuses on.

deleted 2y ago

[deleted]

baudpunk 2y ago

Cursor is so good.

dghlsakjg 2y ago

What are you using to get your code into Claude. Continue, or something similar?

smuser 2y ago
I really like using aider (https://aider.chat https://aider.chat) and heavily leverage the /ask command to have a quick chat on intent and context before prompting it for the code I need.
- rmbyrro 2y ago
  Aider feels like magic
richardw 2y ago
No I just drag files in, at least when I'm working with IntelliJ. Sluggish but works. With VSCode I've used Copilot but still break multi-file tasks out to Claude. I’m sure the eg Cursor workflow is better but it hasn’t bitten for me yet. I also tried Replit and it felt amazing, but quickly got into a place it couldn't escape and it felt like it took too much effort to get it to change direction once it had committed to a plan. This was early, so it's almost definitely better by now.

algo_trader 2y ago

is copilot improving behind the scenes ? I assume you get the latest model, plus some goodies that GH is working on