richardfeynman

10 ms·

91.
by richardfeynman 10mo ago
Everything you say here is false. 1. Israel's stated goal is to neuter Hamas and return the hostages, not kill civilians. 2. Arabs speak a semitic language; the "semites" in "anti-semite" has always referred to Jews
92.
by richardfeynman 10mo ago
I am simply pointing out OP's double standard: when it comes to Israel, everything is to be distrusted; when it comes to Israel's enemies, everything is to be believed. I am well-aware of the differences between Hamas and Hezbolla
93.
by richardfeynman 10mo ago
Hi @dang. Here is a factual comment of mine that does not break the rules which, along with many other comments on one side of the Israel/Palestine issue, was unnecessarily and unjustifiably flagged: https://news.ycombinator
94.
by richardfeynman 10mo ago
Makes a ton of sense, thanks. I wonder if there will be medical applications for this tech, for example identifying people with brain or neurological disorders based on how different their "neural imaging" looks from normal.
95.
by richardfeynman 10mo ago
I noticed you tracked sessions per person, implying a subset of people have many hours of data collected on them. Are predictions for this subset better than the median? For a given amount of data, is it better to have more people with less
96.
by richardfeynman 10mo ago
This is an interesting dataset to collect, and I wonder whether there will be applications for it beyond what you're currently thinking. A couple of questions: What's the relationship between the number of hours of neurodata you c
97.
by richardfeynman 10mo ago
;-)
98.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
Great tutorials.
99.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
"Both statements are beyond doubts. Could you be so kind as to point the disinformation I’m allegedly spreading?" Sure StopDisinfo910. You're spreading the following disinformation:(1) that the IDF establishes control lines a
100.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
No. And stop pretending your delusions are real.
101.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
Earlier cholantesh failed to accept the bedrocks of western jurisprudence. I would be happy to debate cholantesh if he first accepts: (1) the western concept of presumed innocence; (2) that while the video from Sde Teiman does show suspicio
102.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
The videos are current, and there are hundreds more like them. Sorry to burst your bubble! The ingredients (chocolate, vegetables, fresh meat) are let in by Israel, which has let in 1.8 million metric tons of aid during the war, more than a
103.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
... and does not exist in Israel, which is a liberal democracy, not a theocracy, and not fundamentalist.
104.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
His vision is fine. He didn't say Palestinian lives aren't worth saving (you misread him), and the genocide hoax has been debunked.
105.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
tguvot gets it.
106.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
haha I love this thread.
107.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
I agree with you that if all he did was attack the Israeli court system, we could have a reasonable discussion. However, he was not dunking on Israel, he was dunking on the enlightenment and western values of jurisprudence, for example th
108.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
There are active restaurants in Hamas-controlled areas. There are hundreds of videos (and recent google reviews) proving this. Here's one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFjhyAsHYFo
109.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
All the claims are true. > Obesity is common There are countless videos of obese people in Gaza today . > Restaurats everywhere. Google it! Not restaurants under rubble, but restaurants serving faties today. Here's a short list
110.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
"How could there possibly be "restaurants everywhere" after that?" There are plenty of restaurants in Gaza, as a quick Google search will reveal, so this is a question for you to ask yourself. Perhaps your premise is w
111.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
There is no rape shown in the video.
112.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
Just because you called my argument a strawman doesn't make it one. Since I see you're not willing to advocate for normal common law justice, I don't think we'll ever agree, and I'll put this argument to rest. By th
113.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
I see you're linking to some debunked articles about the gaza starvation hoax. Do you seriously think Israel had a policy of starvation? Obesity is common in gaza; there are restaurants everywhere; there aren't any pictures of sta
114.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
He's advocating for a return to medieval methods of justice, and trying to cloak that advocacy with sarcasm. If that's not worth derision (the kind of derision where you simply point out what one is saying), what then is worth der
115.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
The opinion piece you link to is false in two respects: first, Israel has never had a starvation policy in Gaza, and second, the courts never defended the policy because it never existed.
116.
by richardfeynman 11mo ago
I see you ignored this opportunity to confirm the accused is innocent until proven guilty and deserves a fair trial before people call them rapists. Too bad. Of course I didn't walk back my claim that the video is doctored, and of cour
117.
by richardfeynman 1y ago
I made an argument that there should be a trial and argued explicitly against those who think thee shouldn't be a trial. Here's how you responded to my defense of common law and due process: "Right, because over the course
118.
by richardfeynman 1y ago
My comment clearly advocates for common law standards: the right to a trial, the presumption of innocence, and so on. Am I understanding correctly that you think this advocacy--a staple of western thought--is bad faith? You prefer mob rule,
119.
by richardfeynman 1y ago
The whole point of the judicial system is to navigate through contested allegations. A trial is what I'm advocating for. You're the one suggesting we should prejudge this, no trial needed.
120.
by richardfeynman 1y ago
You phrase your argument in a sarcastic way, because if you clearly stated what you mean your argument would appear ridiculous. Take the sarcasm out of your position and this is essentially what you're saying: "Yes, I reject the p

More ›