rich-w-big-ego

5 ms·

1.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
Or we should regulate them, maybe Trump would consider it. It certainly would not cause any sort of economic harm to regulate companies that sit on cash reserves in the hundred billions.
2.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
Yes but you can push to PRs after approval and then merge them.
3.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
Yeah but you can still push commits to a PR that has received approval, and the approval is not revoked.
4.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
Good job clearing the lanes before you drove. I'm sure that left an impression on the kids, that you might have wanted to leave on them even if you're behaviour had a risk to it - maybe they'll save up to buy a Tesla or learn
5.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
I think there's something to this argument. Elon actually realizes this part himself: when he crashes and burns it will burn 100 billion dollars and the credibility of the whole tech industry Elon has stated publically that it w
6.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
Elon used the same over-promising strategy during the build-up to the start of Model 3 production. Elon promised that Tesla would start producing Model 3s in July 2017, noting that production would not actually start until sometime later;
7.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
Your analysis might make sense if money and profitability and staying solvent was what Elon was most interested in. However, money alone is not the goal; getting us off of oil is the goal. I think that Elon really wanted to make a mass-mark
8.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
The iPace would rival the Model X. The iPace is FAR behind the Model X in all performance measures. The iPace has a manufacturer's estimated range of ~350km, no EPA rated range given. The Model X has EPA rated maximum range of 475km -
9.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
Trump believes that the USA is getting a bad deal - not that trade is bad. China may purchase US companies and Universities, but US is nowhere close to being able to do the same in China. Also, you say that Trump misunderstands trade defici
10.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
Martin Tripp ... spoke out after seeing "some really scary things" ... including dangerously punctured batteries installed in cars Yeah, right. How, exactly, does a batter get "dangerously punctured" at any point
11.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
This is an absolutely vile personal attack. This is the poison contained in the blooming flower of the internet.
12.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
It's unclear what your argument is
13.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
I'm drinking Kool Aid? OK. I'm mostly arguing about the use of Static Analysis and other typical means of verifying programs, and the ineffectiveness of those verification methods on neural networks. People use that as an argument
14.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
As usual the comments around Tesla software really miss some critical points: You can't debug a neural net Obviously not, but you also cannot hand-write code to do what neural nets do, so what's your point? If you can make
15.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
The main point you offer is that models can't be statically analysed and will do things unexpected that result in loss of human life. Here's my response: - Humans also do unexpected things, like stepping on the gas instead of the
16.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
You're not being consistent, and revealing your anti-Tesla bias. They have figured out to manufacture the Model 3, they deliver new serial numbers of that car every day of the week. And like I usually say in my replies in Tesla threads
17.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
There are many solutions to the problems that Earth's atmosphere faces. One of the solutions is Accelerated Silicate Weathering[1]. Everyone likes to talk about how screwed we are, but that is yesterday's discussion. Today's
18.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
Intention is also very important. Are they focused on people in the office, or code on the computer?
19.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
Why don't you come out and say what you really mean? djajshgsjja is attempting to justify a handicap against the successful subgroups. But what amount of handicap should there be? In what measure should the handicap apply? How can you
20.
by rich-w-big-ego 8y ago
This is the core conflict. Do we judge people on their competence, or do we judge them by the degree to which they are oppressed?
21.
by rich-w-big-ego 9y ago
At least in Capitalism you are allowed to talk about your suffering. In the communist utopias of the 20th century, speaking of your suffering or trying to alleviate it was a capital offence.
22.
by rich-w-big-ego 9y ago
Let's talk companies. For the uninformed, a part of building a successful vertically integrated battery, car, and truck company that spans the globe that also uses a brand new powertrain and form factor for their products is getting lo