riccardopa

5 ms·

1.
by riccardopa 4y ago
When I see this written, I like to take it quite literally. It means your privacy has a value, literally it is valuable to us. And thus we will monetise it. Why would we not, it has value, after all?
2.
by riccardopa 5y ago
N=35,178. Give us a break, its too small of a study to make any conclusion.
3.
by riccardopa 5y ago
3:00 p.m. rise 3:05 Chivas Regal with the morning papers, Dunhills 3:45 cocaine3:50 another glass of Chivas, Dunhill 4:05 first cup of coffee, Dunhill 4:15 cocaine 4:16 orange juice, Dunhill 4:30 cocaine 4:54 cocaine 5:05 cocaine 5:11 coffe
4.
by riccardopa 6y ago
A yak, very finely shaved indeed!
5.
by riccardopa 6y ago
Case in point - “given a list of numbers, return two numbers ...” is a poor question, because it does not state that the return values must come from the list given.
6.
by riccardopa 7y ago
Super cool hack! The author uses defunctionalised continuations to build an abstract machine directly as a CTE. I guess the fixed point of the transition function is returned by the CTE ... He also alludes to using the Y combinator to build
7.
by riccardopa 7y ago
I’m getting pretty sick of repeats of this ersatz story. Maybe they should use their brains? (Instead of “growing some balls” I mean)
8.
by riccardopa 7y ago
Sadly this article - seemingly an objective mathematical treatment of tuning - is simplistic to the point of worthlessness. No mention is made of stretched tuning, inharmonicity, or psycho-acoustic treatments of tuning. I expected more from
9.
by riccardopa 10y ago
It's fully BuzzWord compliant then! (Sound like this is naked marketing post)