Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ricardobeat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
> or entirely BUSL-styled licenses Let's not get everything mixed up here - I singled out BUSL exactly because it does not prevent competing services , especially at small scale. In fact it would encourage small business and indivi
62.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
Yes, you would be allowed to extend the product. There is no 'it depends', the license is quite short and clear. You have to acquire a commercial license once you go over the revenue threshold, that is all. I find this much simple
63.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
I think the difference they alluded to is that they manually vetoed new users, presumably based on their self-declared goals and ideology, whereas Signal etc are neutral platforms.
64.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
It doesn’t have to be binary. A license like this allows for 99% of the personal and commercial use that a project will ever see, while giving the author leverage over large corporations - which is the main gripe people have. It is not id
65.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
Looks nice. Two main differences: - BUSL is OSI-approved and listed in SPDX, so corporate lawyers won't be scared away by it: https://spdx.org/licenses/BUSL-1.1.html - With BUSL the restriction is revenue-based. Y
66.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
This, for some reason, has become a controversial idea — as evidenced by your comment being downvoted. I don’t understand what angle people are coming from, when they disregard the community effects of open-source software entirely. If your
67.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
No success yet, but I recently found BUSL - used by Terraform: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Source_License It stops companies from building high-revenue products for free, while not being as scary as AGPL
68.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
> We won the debate, and gained little for users or developers. All that our efforts did was to make it easier for big corporations build things more cheaply and for billionaires to become trillionaires. As a long-time developer and cons
69.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
The discs are entirely compliant with the Blu-Ray spec, there is no “compatibility” mark; anything made in the past 10-15 years should work fine. Your writer may be out of spec? Apparently original M-Disc DVDs required a more powerful las
70.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
Something that would take us one month at least, full of bugs, AI now delivers in less than a day, full of bugs
71.
▲
by
ricardobeat
1mo ago
No mention of correctness or task success rate. This only works if the subagent model is much cheaper than the one running your session, which means it will probably be mistaken a lot more often [1] about what the code does. Routing purely
72.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
150k is 2500 tokens/sec.
73.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
> 2025: For $120, the Pi 5 is now available with 16 GB good times
74.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
I'm afraid you will be pushed out of the goose farming market by these new ultra-efficient farming bots.
75.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
Reducing people to [ ] vetted and [x] refused boxes seems to have become a favorite pasttime worlwide.
76.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
A little tangent, but > With a peak circulation of forty thousand—enormous for its time How was it possible to make a living - I imagine a full editorial team, writers, printers, office workers - with this volume of sales, while today, m
77.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
What kind of coding tasks would you expect to hit that limit? In my setup, on a very large codebase, it takes each agent 3-4 minutes at minimum to go past 100k tokens. (note it's 150k uncached tokens , the total limit is 450k/min
78.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
The human-written https://github.com/AxiomMath/PrimeGapsLib adds up to 4MB of Lean so it's that far off.
79.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
I think you're overindexing here. There are no obvious traces of AI in those full paragraphs (and I read thousands of lines of AI generated text daily). These are not the usual tells, just decent writing. It reads pretty much like ever
80.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
What signs of slop are people seeing here? Or is it just a knee-jerk reaction to encountering lots of text? I’ve worked in the field for a long time and see a carefully written, correct, calm article. No obvious AÍ tells in wording or sente
81.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
Interesting. They posted this not long ago: https://jakobgreenfeld.com/smart-web/
82.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
> This includes a proprietary non-foaming toothpaste, formulated without SLS (a common foaming agent) to help keep foam out of the way so the camera can see clearly and support Gap Optical Targeting™, alongside a low-foami
83.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
Honestly, I will just flag every post that is entirely AI slop from now on. This has to stop. The home page for this "independent research firm" is also 100% nonsense [1]. "The record a machine reads is not the one a company
84.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
It is meant to be based on Blender renders: https://kikkupico.github.io/ambientcss/ambient-css/grounded
85.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
Indeed. Those are even more off. It's like they haven't actually looked at what the AI produced - or the agent is also the one writing the replies here.
86.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
Thank you for sharing! A small piece of feedback: it is a really interesting article, but also quite grating to read. I'm guessing you used AI to review/edit, and it seems to have added a lot of filler and coated the piece with it
87.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
I'm sorry but that's just slop. The elevation in the actual CSS makes the shadow progressively lighter (technically correct, thought the proportions look very wrong, 2 is too dark), while the 3D model has it constant. There is not
88.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
> Run Qwen3.8-Flash-Next on a Mac that can't hold it This is the first line of the README. I can't believe people are becoming ok with this, and I'm 100% on the AI train.
89.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
> 'custom dotfiles and a way to apply them to a fresh system' Latest Omarchy 4 is a full ISO installer, with a quickshell-based desktop - not scripts, their own system apps, taskbar, notifications, etc. I'm failing to see
90.
▲
by
ricardobeat
2mo ago
This is awesome. I've been suffering through the process of buying a USB stick, figuring out BIOS and boot options to get Linux on my AMD AI Max mini PC for the past few days. Hope it can get support for Arch-based distros soon.
More ›