rhn_mk1

21 ms·

211.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
I'm not sure what your point is. It may also get sorted quickly. There are already projects going on to write the needed drivers, like libcamera.
212.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
That the user doesn't think in terms of there being people is not a good thing. Compare "sorry, our ticket machine is broken" to the impersonal "System malfunction, please retry". The impersonal version waves any re
213.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
*without replacing the entire thing
214.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
That's because browsers don't do all that much compared to an operating system (although they are catching up). On the other side, since Windows XP, security of the OS's has been steadily improving as well. What breaches do y
215.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
That's like saying "in a native-based future we only need to security proof the OS". There's no free lunch, you always need to check both the sandbox layer and the application.
216.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
Before I answer the rest, could you clarify? > If you ask it about orbital mechanics, it will answer correctly. but > If the text seems to invoke orbital mechanics, it will output discussion-of-orbital-mechanics-y text Do you mean tha
217.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
I'm not saying that those things don't exist, but that if you have no tools to measure them, then no practical consequences can follow from you trying to measure them. I don't see how the McNamara fallacy squares with the emp
218.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
This is classic victim blaming. RIAA not liking what users do caused RIAA to do user-hostile design, from which we're still suffering. Bad users, bad!
219.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
Were the quotes offensive, or was it just a case of someone having a stick up their behind?
220.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
I wonder if they can get the same reaction without the knock part, just with the voice cues.
221.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
> There is no exam that proves the capacity for these things, That's kind of the point tbh. If you can't say anything about something, then in practice either it's pointless to ask about it, or it's better to avoid th
222.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
Could you give an example of a question and explain what in an answer would convince you?
223.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
What are things that would demonstrate each of those?
224.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
To some limited extent, they are already good at maths: https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2201.02177 This paper makes me believe it's less about the lack of ability to understand maths, but the power to learn more
225.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
I do say the same about architecture, but with added nuance: the Sagrada Familia is creative in form, but not in function. It functions as a regular cathedral (or at least an art museum). The creativity is there, but it is subservient to th
226.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
It's not deriving an understanding of this particular concept . Which is unsurprising given that it was not trained to be good at maths. That in no way precludes deriving deep understanding of some other concepts. Even humans are not
227.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
I agree with the loss of understanding being a bad thing, but I cannot mourn the loss of creativity. Programming is a core part of our society and infrastructure, yet it's still one like a craft rather than engineering. Creativity shou
228.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
I don't think people instituting such laws are young enough to remember contet blockers at school.
229.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
Nice try, ChatGPT's evil twin. U-238 is fissionable according to this https://books.google.de/books?id=b5OsewV7smEC&pg=PA473&lpg=P... "Such reactions produce fast neutrons which cause fission in uranium-23
230.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
Luddites failed the first time around. What could they do this time to succeed?
231.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
> exponentially annoying. I see what you did there.
232.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
> Because there are no good cops? Seriously, this is the mother of all generalizations.
233.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
Only immortal cell lines that are integrated with your body are cancer. Given that you didn't cite any sources, I conclude that your fears stem from believing scary-sounding half-truths.
234.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
The government's responsibility is that the government passes the laws to censor things, not that it does the dirty work of actual censorship. Censoring religion and political views is regarded as a violation of human rights, so while
235.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
By this logic, we could decide to censor violence, religion, social media, subcultures, sugar, the study of chemistry, and perhaps coffeine. I don't think it's a blind spot. It's a deliberate decision not to be overprotective
236.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
According to the law of unintended consequences, DnD players will chase endangered species to extinction whenever they want them included in their future campaigns.
237.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
The situation differs. IE lost because it stagnated, as Microsoft didn't care about the Web. Google cares about the Web, and they not only keep developing Chrome, they also keep developing Web standards, meaning that any competitor has
238.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
I'm taking up your offer: please show me. It's clear that you have enough knowledge about it to support your argument, and that I don't even know where to look.
239.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
I'm sure cancerous cell lines exist, but could you show that those are used in cultured meats? Also, did you mean cancerous or carcinogenic? Only the latter therm is about the consequences of eating the thing in question.
240.
by rhn_mk1 4y ago
I think the article stated the point clearly: the author wanted to hold some paper carrying the HTML contents. From what I can see, they hit the point completely. Perfect is the enemy of the good, they say.

More ›