rhaksw

36 ms·

301.
by rhaksw 6y ago
Moderation transparency for reddit with https://www.reveddit.com Also, notification of removals with a desktop extension: http://reveddit.com/add-ons/direct/
302.
by rhaksw 6y ago
Part of the current dilemma is people think only other people's comments are removed [1]. The more people who discover how it works, the less people can take advantage of those who don't. [1] https://www.reveddit.com
303.
by rhaksw 6y ago
> There's definitely manipulation going on by "big tech". We do it to ourselves. I made this site [1] to review moderation on reddit. It works for accounts, subreddits, threads, and there is also a "top posts/com
304.
by rhaksw 6y ago
I hadn't heard of Fennec, does that let you install add-ons that use the somewhat newer WebExtensions API? Specifically I'm curious if this one I made would work, https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
305.
by rhaksw 6y ago
> I want them ranked by something like the ratio of views to upvotes or upvotes compared to total upvotes for that day. Yeah, this is definitely possible with public data. I did something similar on reveddit [1] for removed reddit conten
306.
by rhaksw 6y ago
Snew hasn't been updated in a couple years, its author is focused on a decentralized reddit called https://notabug.io I'm the author of https://www.reveddit.com/about/ . It's a fork of removed
307.
by rhaksw 6y ago
FYI you can review reddit mod actions via https://www.reveddit.com Disclaimer: I made this
308.
by rhaksw 6y ago
Wild, I was just playing QW a week ago for the first time in 20 years and someone was showing me how to do this running technique after destroying me in a one on one.
309.
by rhaksw 6y ago
You're right, and social media users' oxes are being gored, they just don't know about it.
310.
by rhaksw 7y ago
> I don't think being small and private is necessary to prevent unpopular opinions from being shouted down. IMO when promoting your heretical idea you can safely ignore those who shout you down. You need to find the right people (at
311.
by rhaksw 7y ago
Ok here's one, a website that shows things you posted that have been removed from Reddit [1]. Ask HN: heretical or not? This is the only tool AFAIK that shows removed content for a given account. [1] https://revddit.com
312.
by rhaksw 7y ago
I don't see how this relates to leaving reddit out of articles about moderation in social media.
313.
by rhaksw 7y ago
I'm always surprised when articles like this don't mention reddit. Isn't it a top 10 website that was once top 3? I've read quotes saying one in three americans has visited reddit. Anyway, reddit is a great resource for
314.
by rhaksw 7y ago
I had the same experience my first go at integrating Stripe. I was able to accept donations in all the ways I wanted: - using Netlify (free hosting, includes lambda) - custom amounts - one-time payment or recurring - form on my ow
315.
by rhaksw 7y ago
I can prove that's not a typo people make, nobody visited the site for weeks when I first set it up =)
316.
by rhaksw 7y ago
Thanks! I didn't know American ISPs would blacklist domains so easily. I'm also going to try contacting Comcast as I can't figure out what is "dangerous" about the site. It's just client-side javascript that qu
317.
by rhaksw 7y ago
Has anyone seen this error [1] before? A user reported seeing it the other day and I can't figure out if it was an issue with Safari, his ISP, or what. It only happens for him when connected via WiFi on mobile. My SSL certs are auto-up
318.
by rhaksw 7y ago
You could make a quiz for articles using machine learning and allow commenters to optionally complete quiz questions before commenting to earn a flag that says they've read the article. It's not easy, but nothing worth doing is. A
319.
by rhaksw 7y ago
Wow I had no idea. That makes Tildes much more appealing.
320.
by rhaksw 7y ago
Does Tildes enable admins/mods to use either shadow banning or shadow removal?
321.
by rhaksw 7y ago
Hah, that's great. This is the kind of humility that keeps me coming back to hN.
322.
by rhaksw 7y ago
is this much different than JSX? <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row"> <label for="email"/> <input type="text"/> </div> I definitel
323.
by rhaksw 7y ago
> I work at a big company with a great team doing what most people would consider high-level React work that is used by at least hundreds of engineers. But most days if I'm honest I struggle with it too > The great part about Rea
324.
by rhaksw 7y ago
React is more than JSX. I don't think the author is lazy. Some relevant points from the blog, > I’ve done a CodeAcademy class, completed Wes Bos‘s React for Beginners course, bought books, listened to podcasts, and read tutorials. H
325.
by rhaksw 7y ago
he writes, > I also got — and continue to get — a whole lot of (often private) correspondence from a slew of people who feel equally overwhelmed. Adopting a new framework can be tricky. IMO it's okay to write about "the process
326.
by rhaksw 7y ago
> I would argue that 99% of sites sending cookies and personal information to social media do so for tracking purposes. You could click on the reports on this page [1] to find out which sites are broken. Maybe I'll do it when I ha
327.
by rhaksw 7y ago
The site reflects users' own data, and I built it without pay. There are no ads. I am sorry you are upset about it.
328.
by rhaksw 7y ago
Promotion through censorship is what I meant to tackle when building the site, so I'm sorry if you feel the bot or citing it on HN is too promotional. Isn't this the place for sharing such work? If not here, where? The bot itself
329.
by rhaksw 7y ago
> the API access sends the reddit cookie to reddit while not being on reddit. A few things, (1) Why does it matter in this case? Under what scenario can you imagine reddit abusing the knowledge that certain users are reading metadata a
330.
by rhaksw 7y ago
My website is broken by this feature [1]. It does not leak private data, as Mozilla devs said here [2] > According to the original screenshot in the thread, your web page is sending an HTTP request to https://www.reddit.com&#x

More ›