rhaksw

36 ms·

331.
by rhaksw 7y ago
> Many websites will partially break? Which ones? You can get an idea of which sites are blocked by reviewing the list of blocked domains [1] (this includes many APIs, such as reddit.com) and a 5 year old issue where people post websit
332.
by rhaksw 7y ago
> this would block pretty much all the major analytics The list [1], which includes many APIs, also breaks hundreds of websites [2] that access those APIs [1] https://github.com/disconnectme/disconnect-tracking-pro
333.
by rhaksw 7y ago
This feature breaks hundreds of websites listed in a 5 year old issue [1] The last descriptive update was 4 years ago, > As the list is increasingly managed according to policy, breakage is a feature, not a bug. [1] https://
334.
by rhaksw 7y ago
> My general impression is that tracking protection is low-priority for Mozilla It is on by default, and as you point out, breaks many innocent sites. People may migrate elsewhere. That should bump up its priority.
335.
by rhaksw 7y ago
Is it okay for Firefox to maintain a manually curated list of sites it deems to be trackers [1]? Why is reddit on this list and not, say, Gab? This breaks a site I built called reVddit [2], and after discussing with Mozilla devs [3], I&#x27
336.
by rhaksw 7y ago
I've had some issues maintaining reVddit.com while keeping Firefox's tracking protection in mind. I'd love some help if there is anyone who can provide insight. Basically, you can't load reVddit pages on Firefox because
337.
by rhaksw 7y ago
> I have noticed that when I turn on privacy settings on Firefox, some major websites are broken In some cases it is because Firefox's tracking protection is based off of a curated list of websites [1]. This breaks a site I built ca