rglullis

7 ms·

91.
by rglullis 3mo ago
It's already pretty cheap, global and universally available.
92.
by rglullis 3mo ago
We don't need to have space literally transformed into junkyards to make progress, and there is nothing going wrong with going a lower pace if it means reduced impact on the rest of society.
93.
by rglullis 3mo ago
It is not because can do something that they should .
94.
by rglullis 3mo ago
> Their argument is that all team members should use the same tools, and I guess that is a valid point. Why?! It is a text editor for crying out loud. If you are more productive using the tools you want, don't cost anything to the c
95.
by rglullis 3mo ago
I think we are talking about the same thing and reaching wildly different conclusions. If "producing is just the input side" and you still need people to check if the product really solves the user's problems, then I get to c
96.
by rglullis 3mo ago
> But seems like people are working more and not less with AI. Overall productivity hasn't increased, has it? At best there are cases of increased per productivity due to layoffs, at worst it's just busywork. > Somebody need
97.
by rglullis 4mo ago
Do you seriously think that "institutional knowledge" can be maintained by simply writing down a few pages on Confluence or whatever system your company uses for internal documentation?
98.
by rglullis 4mo ago
If you think your business depends on the ability for you to outspend the competition on LLM tokens, then you should cut your losses and shut it down right now.
99.
by rglullis 4mo ago
It doesn't take too big of a stretch to say that "Click" is this movie.
100.
by rglullis 4mo ago
Why not both.jpg? Just sign up to Ollama Cloud, use GLM-5.2. $20/month gives you something on par with Opus (if not better) with quotas so high I'm yet to hit.
101.
by rglullis 4mo ago
> U.S. is trying to achieve AGI at all costs If that was true, they would be collaborating with each other and opening up all the results from their work.
102.
by rglullis 4mo ago
> it seems that you don't really care about that issue. Not in the particular. What I care about is the concentration of power and having to live in a world where a handful of corporations fully dictate how everyone should work. &gt
103.
by rglullis 4mo ago
These are a lot of rationalizations for you to justify the actions of a company whose CEO talks a lot about ethics, but when push comes to shove acts like any other corporate drone. Also, you are talking a lot about what Anthropic can do
104.
by rglullis 4mo ago
You continue with the strawmen. This is beyond grating. > Do you mean you're just pushing fiat through stable coins into an exchange? Not necessarily . The idea is that crypto allows you a backup . If it's possible to work wi
105.
by rglullis 4mo ago
> new customers are not being required to verify their ID by default If they want to use Mythos, they need to provide the ID. It has become a two-class service. > I find it odd to base a decision to close a Claude account on the basis
106.
by rglullis 4mo ago
How is the view from your imaginary moral high horse? Try this: you are a paralegal working with translating/notarizing documents from Spanish to English in Argentina. You have clients in the UK - a wine importer. You send an invoice f
107.
by rglullis 4mo ago
You've created a strawman. In no point a said "society collapse". I am talking about failing institutions. You can find on this very same comment section a handful of people who live in places where cryptocurrency enables peo
108.
by rglullis 4mo ago
If your only idea of "institutional collapse" is "living in a war zone", then I envy you and your sheltered life.
109.
by rglullis 4mo ago
Leaving Anthropic to go to OpenAI is as pointless move as it can be. If both options you are considering are cut from the cloth, financed by the same oligarchs and playing the same game from the same elites, then the game is rigged.
110.
by rglullis 4mo ago
> Companies like Meta and Google This is some weird whataboutism, and it doesn't answer my question. > Anthropic asking customers who voluntarily choose to do business Anthropic is changing the terms. It used to be until last wee
111.
by rglullis 4mo ago
Yes, but the institutions don't need to be performing their function particularly well.
112.
by rglullis 4mo ago
That's a weak argument. If the institutions can collapse because a few powerful people can work against it, then the institution has already failed in the first place. Trump and the general rise of Populism is not the cause of the fa
113.
by rglullis 4mo ago
Exactly. Cryptocurrency is useful as as a backup system against failing/weak institutions. Just that. Like insurance, it was not there to make anyone's lives better but simply to become a safeguard to avoid complete collapse.
114.
by rglullis 4mo ago
> seems to be based on lack of knowledge of the fact that the US government has broad authority to regulate AI services I understand they have the authority. The point that you keep evading to answer is "Why Anthropic only ? Why n
115.
by rglullis 4mo ago
Yeah, we can come up with all sorts of reasons to justify their new policy, but at the end of the day it's clear that this policy only came after Fable got blocked. You keep trying to find a way to rationalize their action, when it is
116.
by rglullis 4mo ago
> why not give the main competitor a go "If Lucifer decided not to take your soul, why not throw yourself at Mammon's feet instead?" We keep asking why society got to such this stage of decay, and I need to keep reminding
117.
by rglullis 4mo ago
> not trusting institutions mean that you no longer have to comply with the rules Not if you can avoid it, no. > every rule is not based on a legitimate concern? This particular rule is not based on a legitimate concern.
118.
by rglullis 4mo ago
It's not a matter of being "unfair", it's a matter of people not trusting the institutions.
119.
by rglullis 4mo ago
Right, but do you agree then this explains why people are not willing to give their identity details to a company, even if the company is able to deduct/obtain these details through other means if it wanted?
120.
by rglullis 4mo ago
> You literally provide your name... Not if you are using through your employer. > they're doing for legal purposes The USA is becoming a Banana Repulic. Having grown up in one, you end up learning that "the law" is nev

More ›