rglullis

19 ms·

361.
by rglullis 9mo ago
> Meanwhile I’ve lost roughly a month from internet issues. If you tell me "I lost internet at home and couldn't work there", it's one thing. But that you simply went about a month without internet connection, I find
362.
by rglullis 9mo ago
Mine was an Intel 386 DX 40MHZ with 2MB RAM and 80MB HD, bought in late 1993.
363.
by rglullis 9mo ago
And more than that, the need for people/business to pay the premium for SOTA getting smaller and smaller. I thought that OpenAI was doomed the moment that Zuckerberg showed he was serious about commoditizing LLM. Even if llama wasn&#x2
364.
by rglullis 9mo ago
Basically we are in agreement: IP addresses, by themselves, are not PII, only when they are linked to other information (a cookie, a request log) then it consitutes processing. So, apologies if I was not precise on my comment, but I still
365.
by rglullis 9mo ago
> a display in their offices that showed the IP address (...) that's not saving or publishing You are not sharing with a third-party, but that sure falls into processing and publishing it.
366.
by rglullis 9mo ago
Yeap, but the thing is: - they don't care about the cookies they are setting on their properties, if most of the functionality they have require you to be authenticated anyway. - These "smaller websites" are exactly the one
367.
by rglullis 9mo ago
When an IP address is linked to any other data, then it counts as PII. By itself, it's not. So, sure, if you stick the user's IP address on a cookie from a third-party service, you are sharing PII. But this is absolutely not th
368.
by rglullis 9mo ago
An IP address is not "personally identifiable data". You can not know who the person is just because you got an IP address in the request. We are almost 10 years into the GDPR, and we still have these gross misunderstandings about
369.
by rglullis 9mo ago
You could also argue in the other direction: capital is never going to be the only thing separating one set of individuals from another, because we sure like to keep finding ways to label ourselves different: ethinicity, religion, politic
370.
by rglullis 9mo ago
Brazil would like to have a word with you.
371.
by rglullis 9mo ago
If you ask the authors of sci-fi dystopias: the corporations owning the means of production will get taxed just enough to keep their masses from starving, the aspirational 14% will ake whatever resources they have to buy shares of this co
372.
by rglullis 10mo ago
One thing I thought that got me interested about Brave was this part of their business modell. It had the potential to support this type of economy almost without any attrition. It was not that different from flattr, with the difference t
373.
by rglullis 10mo ago
Great. That would mean that 98% of the github users would leave it.
374.
by rglullis 10mo ago
Why is it so difficult to separate the work from its creator?
375.
by rglullis 10mo ago
> I’m a huge fan of Gemini. I'm not. I get the whole "the medium is the message" and why it feels appealing to some, but I don't subscribe to the idea that the only way to have proper digital hygiene is by restraining
376.
by rglullis 10mo ago
What's the difference between "let's encourage people to create gemini documents" and "let's encourage people to publish text/markdown documents on the www"?
377.
by rglullis 10mo ago
Yeah, but that would mean me giving money to Sam Altman, and that ain't happening.
378.
by rglullis 10mo ago
I signed up to Claude Pro when I figured out I could use it on opencode, so I could start things on Sonnet/Opus on plan mode and switch to cheaper models on build mode. Now that I can't do that, I will probably just cancel my subs
379.
Tell HN: Anthropic is restricting usage of API keys to Claude Code
1 points by rglullis 10mo ago|1 comments
380.
by rglullis 10mo ago
Oooh... can you imagine if servers actually took the hint and sent only text if the client provided Accept: text/markdown, text/plain headers?
381.
by rglullis 10mo ago
Then you'd have to explain why every reputable newspaper is putting up paywalls and all the quality sites that used to cover specific niches went out of business in the last 20 years. Saying "revenue goes up with content quality&q
382.
by rglullis 10mo ago
This is not how it works. Ad-subsidized content is functionally equivalent to price-dumping. The more ad-subsidized content is out there, the less incentive there is to focus on quality and quantity of eyeballs become the only metric that m
383.
by rglullis 10mo ago
If people are willing to consume content but not willing to pay for it, then you have a very strong indicator it has no value at all and therefore no actual need to be produced in the first place.
384.
by rglullis 10mo ago
> A funding crunch since 2023 yet those features have been necessary for many years before 2023. But before 2023, the funding was going to things like solving state resolution, a VoIP system that was not dependent on Jitsi, getting rid o
385.
by rglullis 10mo ago
There is nothing special about independent relays. ActivityPub also have relays around. Store-and-forward is how IRC works.
386.
by rglullis 10mo ago
> I dont see any reason why an app approach cant support that. Matrix clients have e2ee encryption like Signal or WhatsApp. Every single one of my close contacts that I have on my server have ignored or misunderstood the instructions t
387.
by rglullis 10mo ago
Is Twitter still in any way relevant? I understand that those people who already have a following would be less inclined to give it up, but whenever I go back is to delete the half a dozen of bot comments on old posts of mine.
388.
by rglullis 11mo ago
> No just the first part, Ok. Then the question is "If the US really goes full isolationsist and packs it home, who takes the power vaccum?" > China ain't doing no ground invasion for oil I didn't say that "Ch
389.
by rglullis 11mo ago
"Don't do anything, let China handle it" ?
390.
by rglullis 11mo ago
Portuguese IDs also have a sim card, but I never used it for anything other than accessing government services.

More ›