rfrank

33 ms·

271.
by rfrank 10y ago
> Different than activists for civil rights or honest government/business. If you perceive the Right or Left to be the greater threat given the information that you have, why do you have any obligation to report on them equally? IE
272.
by rfrank 10y ago
Bias is acceptable if you're earning a profit? The "that we all know is bullshit" bit is highly debatable, and doesn't really reflect the reality of news consumption for most Americans [1]. How does releasing information
273.
by rfrank 10y ago
david soloff sends his regards
274.
by rfrank 10y ago
from a different sub: http://imgur.com/s27EVHS
275.
by rfrank 10y ago
i'll place trust in wikileaks over the obama administration, clinton campaign, and washington post any day. this conversation is over, have a shitty day.
276.
by rfrank 10y ago
your question gets an answer when you answer mine. write your whole thought out at once, learn to proofread. i'm not going to f5 for an hour so you can get your whole thought out.
277.
by rfrank 10y ago
it's cute watching you continually edit your posts. why do you think "it's fake" is the only logical conclusion to someone not stepping forward as the source of the leak from within the state dept? surely it's not b
278.
by rfrank 10y ago
replying to your most recent comment: 1. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/will-wikileaks-as... 2. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-11/how-julia...
279.
by rfrank 10y ago
"avoid political bias" Their primary reporter, Kim LaCapria, "described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She
280.
by rfrank 10y ago
@etjossem My source is too small for you. Your sources are too guilty of collusion for me. I'm not going to wait for Amazon's clickbait/advertorial farm to tell me something is true or not. Think it's a coincidence that
281.
by rfrank 10y ago
k
282.
by rfrank 10y ago
"We're talking about..." We're also talking about what they were talking about at the time, which includes who specifically to shoot missiles at from a drone. People with names like Obama say people with names like al-Aw
283.
by rfrank 10y ago
Are you skipping the, "...Clinton recalled having many discussions related to nominating an individual for a drone strike." portion of the quote on purpose? That's not "formalizing the process for authorizing a drone str
284.
by rfrank 10y ago
They're on the same level. Does that make them both Arbiters Of Truth? Or is that lofty title reserved for PolitiFact and HRC's campaign page?
285.
by rfrank 10y ago
Is the only way for you find the claim she said the above statement true that someone produce a recording of the meeting at State where they were discussing droning people? Strikes me as an unreasonable bar, but hey, do you. Think recording
286.
by rfrank 10y ago
"completely misinformed" https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-... "“Clinton could not recall a specific process for nominating a target for a drone strike and recalled much debate
287.
by rfrank 10y ago
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/activist-who-took-credit-f... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCx3ov55tUw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGRFEiLBZCE https://www
288.
by rfrank 10y ago
if pure military industrial complex expansion was the goal, we'd already be fighting in the south china sea. a huge amount of manufacturing would be forced to move stateside again, and lockheed/nothrop/boeing/raytheon&#x
289.
by rfrank 10y ago
No, it isn't.
290.
by rfrank 10y ago
FBI report. Of course, it's a "joke" that Hillary "can't recall." Even though, "The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources s
291.
by rfrank 10y ago
Does painting all of your opposition's supporters as racist/sexist/xenophobic/ignorant/violent count as inciting violence? Or is protesters attacking Trump supporters across the country Trump's fault too?
292.
by rfrank 10y ago
"Can't we just drone the guy?" - Hillary Clinton, on Assange.
293.
by rfrank 10y ago
Do you have an actual comment on the content of the report, or just low level FUD about its source? This comment is actually pretty hilarious given the fact that Teneo Holdings, mentioned in the report, was founded by ex Bill Clinton staffe
294.
by rfrank 10y ago
"hasn't been a single shred." http://www.g-a-i.org/u/2016/08/Report-Skolkvovo-08012016.pdf
295.
by rfrank 10y ago
/pol/ is fast on a lot of international news that gets picked up slowly in the states too. they were on the us' accidental bombing of syrian troops last month [1] pretty much instantly. 1. http://www.thedailybeast.
296.
by rfrank 10y ago
Things like surgery or a military operation are very different than creating a system to avoid licensing requirements. The people who make the life support system for the surgeon or the comms for the officer always take compliance seriously
297.
by rfrank 10y ago
You can't, which is one of several reasons why the original fuckup was so serious. Your track record matters. Why would a new customer go with Zenefits over someone who's always taken compliance seriously? If equity value is what&
298.
by rfrank 10y ago
> That said, many early employees would have corrected these problems if they were widely known. How can anyone on the outside be sure there aren't comparable problems which still aren't widely known? I just don't see a re
299.
by rfrank 10y ago
How many people even believe that Zenfits has effectively addressed its compliance/culture problems? I know I don't trust them.
300.
by rfrank 10y ago
The entire world has dirt on Clinton given her email server security.

More ›