> Different than activists for civil rights or honest government/business. If you perceive the Right or Left to be the greater threat given the information tha

> Different than activists for civil rights or honest government/business. If you perceive the Right or Left to be the greater threat given the information that you have, why do you have any obligation to report on them equally? IE how 75-100% of CNNs front page is anti-Trump stories on any given day. > It's odd that we see revelations and reports on both of them consistently from groups like The Guardian and The Intercept but not this activist. Why? > Constantly fund-raising then charging people for little Assange parties. Fundraising doesn't mean profit. 501c3s also fund raise. As I'm sure you and basically everyone else on this site is aware, running an org that's active in multiple countries over the course of a decade isn't free. > His leaks and reports in the old days were a mix of evil government and business. The current Podesta emails somehow aren't? Have you read them at all? For instance, the stories about Podesta's dealings in Russia [1]. This email [2] includes an attached legal bill regarding formation of Leonidio LLC. Is that not government and business corruption? 1. http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/how-hillarys-campaign-chief-hid-money-from-russia/ http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/how-hillarys-campaign-chief-hid-m... 2. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13946 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13946