residentcoder

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by residentcoder 3y ago

   Added parenthesis to make what your parent commentor is saying clearer: >I appreciate that the author clearly states that security, (i.e., output can't be reversed back to the input), is a non-requirement.
2. 2.▲
   by residentcoder 3y ago

   In their defense, NASA did use the same artistic rendition...
3. 3.▲
   by residentcoder 4y ago

   They're going to build it enough to the point that Salesforce will buy them.
4. 4.▲
   by residentcoder 4y ago

   From the article: >Mr. Paxton said in a statement. “I will continue to fight Big Tech to ensure the privacy and security of all Texans.” It's obvious pandering to the masses. This is about Mr.Paxton trying to get some attention.
5. 5.▲
   by residentcoder 4y ago

   >Which you replied to with a very apathetic and condescending Well, he did say he felt offended that he wasn't included in the list. >You should have used this as an opportunity to make your employees believe they made the right
6. 6.▲
   by residentcoder 5y ago

   >Flashing headlights is also "i see you trying to merge in front of me and i'll give you space." I do this for the same reason - or more generalized - 'I see you are about to do _x_, and I acknowledge - go ahead'