renanoliveira0

3 ms·

1.
by renanoliveira0 19d ago
> Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, I don't think it should. Why exactly should what you think the world should look like determine what other people are allowed to build?
2.
by renanoliveira0 2y ago
so, we will all pay for browsers for google don't be a monopoly anymore, that is the plan?
3.
by renanoliveira0 2y ago
These are two completely different things. One thing is solving the problem for the world as a whole. That’s the ideal scenario, the one we should aim for. It might get resolved, it might not, but it will definitely take a good amount of ti
4.
by renanoliveira0 2y ago
I could certainly be wrong, but that doesn't seem to be the case to me. When you completely separate routines from the data, you end up coupling the code that calls the routine with the data it’s passing. I don’t see how it would be po
5.
by renanoliveira0 2y ago
Well said. I think the issue stems from the same point. Both cases assume that individuals are being coerced out of their potential to transform the world for the better, whether by Big Brother or by TikTok. In my view, both stem from an as
6.
by renanoliveira0 2y ago
At what point did this become a valid and legitimate issue? Why do we feel the need to prefer or not prefer what others do with their time? Isn’t that something that concerns only the person and their own life, which really shouldn’t concer
7.
by renanoliveira0 3y ago
Worse for whom? The purpose of the absolute majority of software is to make money. The means of achieving this are varied, that's all.
8.
by renanoliveira0 6y ago
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r19&hw=...