Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
remus
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
64 ms
·
811.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
One pattern that I've used when parsing large json responses is to have a table schema like frequently|used|data|in|these|cols|full_json_response So you pull out the fields you need frequently but have the full json so you can
812.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
That seems very odd. Somewhat similar to putting up a billboard then saying it's illegal for people to read it, as the billboard wasn't intended for them.
813.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
There's nothing inherently wrong with crawlers and automated tools, but there's a lot of poorly written scrapers out there that can easily generate a huge volume of traffic along with the associated maintenance. Why waste time cat
814.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
Presumably some of their 85000 employees prefer to use iphones.
815.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
Im a bit out of date, but lots of databases are moving towards an in-memory model (or in-memory feature sets) which means that hard drive access times aren't a bottleneck. The AWS EC2 instances you see with 1TB+ of RAM are generally ai
816.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
What do you mean by 'fast enough'? As compiled languages go I think it's generally accepted that go compiles relatively quickly, especially for large projects with lots of dependencies (as it has saner dependency rules than c
817.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
The pricing is interesting when you compare it to G Suite pricing. For $10/user/month (with a minimum of 5 users) you get unlimited storage space. a pretty roundabout way of getting unlimited storage, but then you'd also save
818.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
Given that go is already pretty well specified (and, perhaps more importantly, has 2 mature implementations) it's hard to see what advantages having it formally standardised would bring. https://golang.org/ref/spec
819.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
I'd be surprised if something similar to python 2/3 happens. The go team have been very explicit in saying that all go 1 code must continue to compile, and transitioning to go 2 needs to be as seamless as possible (most likely usi
820.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
Total guess, but might be better adoption of IPv6 amongst consumer ISPs comapred to business ISPs?
821.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
I think it's worth remembering that the userbase of chrome is huge and largely non-technical (i.e. they're not going to be on hn, twitter, reddit etc. voicing their opinion on the privacy implications of this change). What if for
822.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
Yeah, and it's a crap customer experience imo. You're lured in with an attractive starting offer only for the company to change the deal after you've signed up. Maybe im just being overly optimistic in thinking it'd be n
823.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
Just playing devil's advocate... "Why did you offer me a service that was unsustainable in the first place? I just want the keep paying the same for the same product you've sold me for the last x months."
824.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
In the UK (and EU I think) you can pick your own PIN. You just go to any atm and there's a 'change your PIN' option.
825.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
Google's long history of supporting their paid products, you mean?
826.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
Worth bearing in mind that hopefully a lot of that will be runtime overhead, so it won't scale linearly with the size of your program.
827.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
I believe there's been some debate within the go team as to how well a non-go GC would work with go, as the current GC is pretty tuned to the quirks of go (go routine stacks etc.)
828.
▲
by
remus
8y ago
> Ip adresses are needed for security anslysis in case of attacks, for example. Then you have a legitimate need for the data, so store it for a reasonable length of time and then delete it.
829.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
> Even dep, the officially supported PDM, seems supposed to fade. I beleve this was always the plan. The dep readme certainly makes it sound that way at least: > dep is a prototype dependency management tool for Go. It requires Go 1.8
830.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
> If you're building decoupled code you shouldn't need cross project changes. That's the theory, but in practice designing robust, future proof APIs has proven to be really hard in a lot of cases. You're then left wi
831.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
Is paying editors typical for a journal? Id guess Nature is comparatively well off financially, so would smaller journals be able to afford to pay editors in the same way?
832.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
I don't think they're quite useless (they tend to contain some interesting ideas, which presumably work as google have generally implemented them) but as you say they're definitely not 'science' as they can't b
833.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
I wonder if it's related to the sink over which it's installed? The taps have always worked well in my experience.
834.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
Let's not forget the part where people write shitty scripts that bombard your server with 10x the quantity of traffic you see from actual users. There's shittiness from both producers and consumers.
835.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
From a security perspective asking users to install specific extensions is pretty poor behaviour to encourage. Just yesterday I had to stop my girlfriend from installing a dodgy extension from a 'just install this one extension to view
836.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
> Now I learn that there isn't one thing to learn but a vast array? No thanks. I had this apparently romantic view that an equation is an equation (the same equation) anywhere in the world. It's not as bad as that! You're
837.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
The maintainers have already publicly stated that this will be the case. They used python 2 to 3 as an example of what they're NOT going to do.
838.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
>> A generational collector is currently under development (but won't be in 1.10). > Does it? Do you have a link? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gCsFxXamW8RRvOe5hECz98Ft... This is the original
839.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
In addition to what everyone else has said, I think the wording is quite important. My reading is that encoding takes up 70% of their CPU hours. A 92% saving on that is obviously very good, but there's a lot of other ways you can spend
840.
▲
by
remus
9y ago
It's hard to say without seeing the numbers as they're almost certainly getting a very steep discount from Aws (in return for extolling the virtues of Aws, being pushed in Aws promo material etc.) In addition I would assume there&
More ›