Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
remus
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
43 ms
·
571.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I agree with the principal, but in practice the mailing list post is pretty inscrutable to me (as a casual git user, maybe more experienced users find it more helpful?) On the other hand the github blog post provides a lot of extra context
572.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
Surely what the world really needs is a new, faster implementation of IndexedDB? I propose writing it on top of this sqlite implementation, so we get the full indexedDB on sqlite on indexedDB on sqlite experience.
573.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
> It's not a trade. The worker just loses. How so? Money (pay decrease) for time (no commuting = 10 hours of your life back every week) seems like a pretty classic trade.
574.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I don't think anyone is arguing that Google/apple shouldn't be able to charge to use their stores. What is wrong is the amount they charge and the lack of options if you don't want to pay that fee. In a non-monopolistic
575.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
As well as the other use cases mentioned, they're harder to guess than incrementing integer IDs so are a useful defense in depth to help stop people guessing URLs for resources.
576.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I think it's worth noting that the proposed change is only to prevent alerts from cross origin iframes, not in general.
577.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
When there are billions of users and millions of websites I think it's very rare that you'll have 'correct' solutions, just different trade offs.
578.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I wonder what proportion of android devices are running <3.0?
579.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I've started building a little app that uses the serial port API. It's a little widget for collecting and processing data from a pretty custom piece of hardware. It'd be a total dream if we could just send people to a web pag
580.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
> It's precisely their fault, they've created an environment that incentivizes low quality, irrelevant content and are actively hostile towards users. I think this is an overly harsh take. I strongly suspect that any algorithm
581.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
> On the other hand, I strongly distrust Google to maintain my data securely. As far as I can tell, aside from backwards compatibility/legacy reasons, the major reason people use Office 365, for better or worse, are issues like comp
582.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
> 30% revenue share is a lot...but it doesn't kill entire categories of apps. Personally Im not so optimistic. 30% is a huge chunk of revenue and is completely unworkable for anything that doesn't have a huge margin built-in.
583.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
> They wouldn't since the property deed was transferred; as long as a court doesn't rule that the transfer was illegal because of forged signatures, the bank won't / shouldn't do anything - what if the accusation
584.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
Im amazed they found a bank who would provide a mortgage against a property that was part of a legal dispute over ownership.
585.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
> Why there's so much parsing related exploits? Broadly, because by necessity you're dealing with untrusted inputs in a relatively complex format. The complexity leaves room for bugs in how you handle the input and the user sup
586.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I imagine a lot of businesses who use google workspace use it as it's bundled (why pay for zoom, teams etc. on top).
587.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I find stories like the one linked incredibly frustrating. There's no detail whatsoever about what actually happened, so we're basically in a he-said-she-said between google and the regulator. If google's done something wrong
588.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
A quick bit of googling suggests that copper ore is between 0.4% and 12% copper [1]. Just guessing, but I'd be surprised if there was anything like that much copper in a generic landfill site which makes me think it'd be pretty un
589.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
Oh cool, thanks for clarifying! In the context of the article, I thought you were saying one was better than the other.
590.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
If that is the argument, does it matter whether it is Apple or Google who is holding the physical data? Apple and Google are both based in the US and beholden to the US government, so from the government's perspective it's just a
591.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I don't think that is really the point that was being made. As you say the practical chances of google storing this data for x years, then committing corporate suicide by decrypting it is are miniscule (and presumably apple agrees). Th
592.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I think the main point that the article makes is that for copyright to work you need some notion of a creative work, and so far it's generally accepted that snippets like i = i + 1 aren't creative enough to be covered by co
593.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I completely agree and didn't mean to suggest it wasn't a serious vulnerability: as I understand it this attack means that if any VM in the subnet is compromised that can be leveraged in to an attack on any VM in the subnet so you
594.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
While it certainly seems like a fairly serious vulnerability I think it's worth highlighting that this attack requires that either you already have access to a machine on the same subnet as the target machine or that the firewall in fr
595.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
> I need the control you won't have with a cloud offering (you can't install extensions) Depends on who you go with. Google's managed postgres thing lets you install supported extensions. https://cloud.google.co
596.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
Regarding your proposed scheme, what's to stop me taking a screenshot from the app and sharing it with all my friends? If the QR code contains no personal info then how does the person scanning it know who the code was generated for?
597.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
I was responding to the parent comment (which from my reading asked why users can't tell google which country they want their account to be associated with) not the article.
598.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
Because Google has to satisfy the legal requirements of the country the user is actually in.
599.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
> I'm not sure I believe all these 0.0% usage stats for all mildly old versions. I lent my spare Android 2.2 phone to someone just a couple months ago. A quick Google search suggests there's about 2.5 billion android users. 0.0
600.
▲
by
remus
5y ago
It's not another messaging solution, it's a new feature in the google messaging app on android that's been around forever.
More ›