3 ms·
> It's not a trade. The worker just loses. How so? Money (pay decrease) for time (no commuting = 10 hours of your life back every week) seems like a pretty cla
by remus 5y ago
> It's not a trade. The worker just loses.
How so? Money (pay decrease) for time (no commuting = 10 hours of your life back every week) seems like a pretty classic trade.
- jatone 5y agobecause that time wasn't spent on work anyways. it was already 'free' for the company. this is literally just trying to claw back money for a perk people really like. the fact companies pay different rates based on locale is insane given the value of the work a person contributes to a company is independent of said location.
- scollet 5y agoIf you're already compensated for the commute then it's a different story.