remram

21 ms·

331.
by remram 2y ago
Oh man, they went crazier than that with "secops", "itops", "finops", "dataops". Every Foozler person is now "doing FooOps", every dev is "devops". Titles have never been about cla
332.
by remram 2y ago
No screenshot, no video, can't middle-click on any of the links. This is a terrible landing page! I hope the product is different, but I have no way to find out since no public demo.
333.
by remram 2y ago
Yeah and installing it as a systemd service, which uses basically as much namespacing/cgroup/supervision/mounts as any other container runtime.
334.
by remram 2y ago
You shifted the goalpost from "needs a cluster to run" to "3 components" just so you could call us naive?
335.
by remram 2y ago
"excruciating details"? I don't think I would ever get to the network if you asked that. I would have to cover how you pressing "enter" gets encoded by the keyboard, how the USB bus works, the interrupt processed by
336.
by remram 2y ago
It's not that much lower than the current limit of 100 per 6 hours.
337.
by remram 2y ago
> bloated container runtime As opposed to what? SystemD?
338.
by remram 2y ago
Spegel shares images between your machines (not everyone's) in a peer-to-peer fashion: https://github.com/spegel-org/spegel
339.
by remram 2y ago
Or just the web storage API
340.
by remram 2y ago
And you can't develop one of those "deployments" without all the other ones being present? That just seems like super-terrible engineering, but I can believe it. Gotta be "web-scale".
341.
by remram 2y ago
I don't really understand the point of this. I have a production cluster and I develop locally. My dev environment is not connected to the production cluster. That seems super dangerous. My dev environment has the database with mock da
342.
by remram 2y ago
Strictly, no.
343.
by remram 2y ago
The point is not opsec but speed, under the GP's assumption that Mullvad exit nodes have better reputation than tor exit nodes. Not sure if the case, I don't use Mullvad.
344.
by remram 2y ago
They specifically say "connect personal stuff" not "browse the web"
345.
by remram 2y ago
Run Mullvad over Tor instead of Mullvad over this Obscura thing ;-)
346.
by remram 2y ago
This was already discussed last week: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43016574 The security on the whole thing still relies on the idea that those two providers, who are partnering to offer this service and sharing the
347.
by remram 2y ago
I mean, I totally agree, but I assumed you would play during high traffic when all seats are taken. The rules don't even say what you do with a non-full hand.
348.
by remram 2y ago
> Selecting a row near the doors can increase the likelihood of passenger turnover I don't think that's true. People get off when they get to their destination whether or not it is easy to reach the door, and sit in available s
349.
by remram 2y ago
But what's the play? It seems you don't have any control over the hand, no control over the evaluation, and there is no betting either. Something more akin to bingo, where you call out when a winning combination is found, would be
350.
by remram 2y ago
The problem I have with uv is that it is not opinionated enough, or complete enough. It still needs a backend for building the package, and you still have a choice of backends. In other words, it is a nice frontend to hide the mess that is
351.
by remram 2y ago
Your tone is more likely to get them to never release anything again. Wtf.
352.
by remram 2y ago
Or they might be much less? What is your argument? They have a higher amount of customers who think they need protection. They are an obvious target for surveillance. And as TFA says: > VPN providers that lied about "no logs" n
353.
by remram 2y ago
From TFA: > VPNs just provide an encrypted tunnel to another ISP, and therefore do not offer anonymity.
354.
by remram 2y ago
Somebody specifically asked about adding HTTPS to their jupyter notebook, and you are pointing out a solution that is not needed for jupyter, will show certificate errors, and is "useful" only in ways you only hint at. Thank you f
355.
by remram 2y ago
You don't need Caddy then, use --certfile and --keyfile
356.
by remram 2y ago
You don't "choose" your IPv6, they are assigned to you. Even if you used private IPs (ULA) for whatever reason, there are enough of those too not to conflict. By comparison my company uses the entirety of the private IPv4 spa
357.
by remram 2y ago
For servers, if you have anything pointing to it (DNS, clients pointing to the IP, firewall rules...)
358.
by remram 2y ago
What is the "IPv4 Literals" test?
359.
by remram 2y ago
That does not match my experience either. In fact I don't see why any mail server would bother getting and configuring an IPv6, listen on it, just to drop all received messages. Just don't listen on v6, that would achieve your goa
360.
by remram 2y ago
You'd still need a domain to get a certificate.

More ›