4 ms·
Or they might be much less? What is your argument? They have a higher amount of customers who think they need protection. They are an obvious target for survei
by remram 2y ago
Or they might be much less? What is your argument?
They have a higher amount of customers who think they need protection. They are an obvious target for surveillance.
And as TFA says:
> VPN providers that lied about "no logs" never faced any meaningful consequences. https://www.theregister.com/2011/09/26/hidemyass_lulzsec_controversy/ https://www.theregister.com/2011/09/26/hidemyass_lulzsec_con...
- andix 2y agoI have no idea what "TFA" refers to. My argument is: Some/many providers are known to abuse user data, are required by law to store them. Are actively and legally selling the data. Most VPN providers don't do that. Some might, but a lower probability is still better than knowing that the ISP is legally required to store your data and give them to the authorities. (this really depends on the country, in some countries ISPs are required not to store connection data, in others they are)
- kps 2y agoTFA = The Featured Article… or something.