Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
reliefcrew
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> The idea is simple in theory Unfortunately it is very difficult in practice. And a wise person once said: “Theory and practice sometimes clash. And when that happens, theory loses. Every single time.” The problem will become thorny
32.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
Maybe finding this out was the point of the task? IOW, part of the interview... if you find the exploit you pass, if not fail. Just theorizing.
33.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
Will you need it to do banking, drive a car, file taxes, and travel throughout your region?
34.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
IDK what the fee schedule looks like but you'd think they'd take a play from governments and make the commissions progressive. In other words, the more money a developer makes, the more fees they pay. That way there's better
35.
▲
Apple becomes a debt collector with its new developer agreement
(techcrunch.com)
12 points
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
|
4 comments
36.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
"Apple on Wednesday released an updated developer license agreement that gives the company permission to recoup unpaid funds, such as commissions or any other fees, by deducting them from in-app purchases it processes on developers’ be
37.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
Sweet. I think you're making a good move. Best to own the kernel of your infrastructure... then rely on cloud services as growth allows. That's why I went through this exercise a couple of years ago: https://news.ycombi
38.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
Yeah, it's a big world and it has a clever way of getting what it wants. On a serious note I'd say you'll just have to balance your design w/ what people are willing to pay for. You probably know this already though :-)
39.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> Have you actually looked for alternatives, or is AD "good enough"? TBH, I always thought YP/NIS was good enough... but I live in a tiny bubble. Obligatory: https://xkcd.com/927/ P.S. Your cert for
40.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> Finally, our evaluation did not involve active adversarial optimization. Good luck!
41.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
I see. I'll have to read the marketing more closely next time, lol. The cynic in me only notices the detection rate comparisons, which I'm sure the marketing folks don't mind much ;-)
42.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
Can you comment on the notion that Turnstile's primary goal isn't to keep bots out 100% but instead to slow them down to "human" speeds. Asking because as a dev I hate when sites don't allow bots... however can appr
43.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
Depends on the "widget mode" you choose: https://developers.cloudflare.com/turnstile/concepts/widget/...
44.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
https://unbound.docs.nlnetlabs.nl/en/latest/use-cases/home-r... (EDIT: pretty random; chosen via: `grep -Po "http[^ ]+" index.htm | shuf -n1`)
45.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> It is a well documented security concern A reference would be appreciated.
46.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> The worry of losing your address should remain largely the same You should actually worry more about losing your address because now there are two people who can screw you... the ESP (email service provider) _and_ their registrar. If
47.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> do a `dig soa hey.com` and you'll see they're registered w/ cloudflare Sorry, this should be a whois search to see their registrar, the dig will show you who provides their DNS. In hey.com s case both are the same....
48.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> I am referring to an email provider that uses its own domain Well, where do you think they get their domain from? The same place you do, a registrar. You're just adding a layer. For example, you mention hey.com.... do a `dig soa h
49.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> some of your users are low value monetarily but do provide value by being on the network That's not how advertising works. If you're not looking at the advertising, you don't provide any value, nothing. In that case yo
50.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> This is an attempt to protect against a legitimate security concern. Yeah, I understand you're concerned. What I question is the legitimacy. Why would your DNS registrar turn against you, but your email service provider's n
51.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
Forget the speculation and aesthetic/subjective judgments for a moment. My point is they have to do something with users who free ride on their system. They decided to give them an ultimatum. And, this sounds like a reasonable design d
52.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> I would genuinely like to know why I'm wrong and these decisions aren't as bad as they seem. Because it's not a $1.6 trillion dollar hobby or charity. They need to make money, full stop. This can't be emphasized eno
53.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
Their design decisions aren't as bad as you think. You just haven't come to terms with how the "free" internet works yet.
54.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
Sorry, your concern doesn't compile. You're worried about losing your domain and instead you've decided to worry about losing your address on someone else's domain? Sounds to me like you're not fixing anything but j
55.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> by all means go and compete as much as you want Just for clarification, competing isn't preferred because it's easier... IDK if it is or not. Competing, however, does not conflict with my ethics. IOW, if the government deputi
56.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> You're wildly hallucinating, are you an LLM? Lol, am I? Ok I'll ignore the ad hominem and simply ask again for an example of something you'd rather buy from the government than the free market? New car? New phone? Clothe
57.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
In the entire history of the world, no one with a choice ever bought anything from the government because they thought the government's offering was superior to that available on the free market. Please, if you know of an example feel
58.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
> Could you imagine iPhone having a section "coming soon" in their OS? Yes, easily... it would look a lot like WWDC ;-) Perhaps it's worth looking past the implementation per se.
59.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
I'd say the correct answer is, as usual, "it depends". If the "coming soon" message is framed as a marketing tease and the features are indeed delivered as they've been promised then I don't see a problem.
60.
▲
by
reliefcrew
10mo ago
I like this, but you still have to pay your taxes.
More ›