relequestual

5 ms·

1.
Speaking Pirate Is Against Microsoft AI Content Policy?(words.benhutton.me)
2 points by relequestual 7mo ago|0 comments
2.
by relequestual 10mo ago
The JSON Schema community would LOVE some more detailed feedback on this. We would ideally like to do that in our slack or via a GitHub Discussion. Can you reach either of those OK? Please ping/mention me, same username.
3.
50M requests in 7 days on JSON-schema.org(json-schema.org)
3 points by relequestual 3y ago|1 comments
4.
by relequestual 3y ago
The team at JSON Schema finally got access to deeper network traffic analytics via CloudFlare. We knew there were lots of requests being made, but details were limited. We dive into the data and make some interesting discoveries.
5.
by relequestual 3y ago
We (JSON Schema) did a case study/interview with the guy behind it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yYTxLZZk58&list=PLHVhS4Tj1Y...
6.
Scaling forms and data validation at Remote(json-schema.org)
2 points by relequestual 3y ago|0 comments
7.
Solving communication between analysts and engineers(json-schema.org)
1 points by relequestual 3y ago|0 comments
8.
by relequestual 4y ago
Here's a YouTube playlist of 6 case studies with companies of various sizes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkziMQD7pqQ&list=PLHVhS4Tj1Y... There are also two written case studies on the JSON Schema blog: https:&
9.
Ask HN: How does/should open source projects handle non-technical conflict?
2 points by relequestual 4y ago|0 comments
10.
by relequestual 4y ago
It is not =] Additionally, the value is a "schema" as opposed to a boolean, meaning you can apply a subschema to any additional fields. Useful if you for instance want to make sure any additional fields start with a specific prefi
11.
by relequestual 4y ago
Part of the problem is they wrote that site and its content for a specific version of JSON Schema. The `items` keyword no longer takes an array form value in the latest version of the specification, while their documentation shows that it d
12.
by relequestual 4y ago
Actually, currently, this is not the case. The specification explicitly allows for additional fields for the purposes of extensions. We are considering changing that, and only allowing pre-defined fields, or having a way to mark specific fi
13.
by relequestual 4y ago
A project exists which does this, and the team even support its development: https://github.com/sourcemeta/alterschema Personally, I'd like to see it become officially supported. We have work to do!
14.
by relequestual 4y ago
Thanks for sharing. This is useful commentary to see. We try to be helpful to maintainers. If any have questions, the JSON Schema server has an implementers channel! We would like to be able to support implementers financially, but we need
15.
by relequestual 4y ago
The OP actually created a tool that allows you to upgrade your schemas between versions of JSON Schema. It's pretty neat, and has had the eyes of those who write the spec. https://github.com/sourcemeta/alterschema
16.
by relequestual 4y ago
And this is exactly why we are asking this sort of question. This sort of feedback is useful. Thanks. Some of the people working on the spec have had a similar idea and it may end up being part of the spec.
17.
by relequestual 4y ago
Watch out for that second link. Not everything there is accurate. If you or anyone has suggestions to improve the docs (first link), filing issues or PRs are more than welcome!
18.
by relequestual 4y ago
Could you elaborate where you see the namespacing?
19.
A space-efficiency benchmark of JSON-compatible serialization specifications(sourcemeta.github.io)
1 points by relequestual 5y ago|0 comments
20.
JSON Schema (fundamentals) in 5 minutes(json-schema.org)
3 points by relequestual 5y ago|0 comments
21.
Ask HN: What’s so hard about good tests?
1 points by relequestual 5y ago|1 comments
22.
by relequestual 5y ago
This is correct. If I had used a more complex example, it would have been much harder to follow. This was the simplest. We factor this out for our meta-schema construction due to reuse.
23.
by relequestual 5y ago
Do you mean the article or the specification?
24.
by relequestual 5y ago
Expectation of a single schema by existing tooling.
25.
by relequestual 5y ago
If only they had used used the official test suite... which is provided, free of charge, in JSON.
26.
JSON Schema bundling formalised(json-schema.org)
140 points by relequestual 5y ago|183 comments
27.
by relequestual 5y ago
We really just wanted to signal that people shouldn't expect any attention on issues or PRs raised against Hyperschema till we can make time for it. Spec work is hard ya'll
28.
by relequestual 9y ago
Hi all! I'm one of the new team that works on JSON Schema since draft-4. I could spend time addressing each issue raised here, but that could take some time... @niftich We've (the new authorship) actually been working on JSON Sche
29.
UK MP's won't read your internet censorship letters(clidus.com)
29 points by relequestual 13y ago|11 comments
30.
by relequestual 13y ago
I remember during my degree, we were literally told to copy paste some javascript and change few variables. That was it for javascript... If it wasn't for SO, I would never have got the placement I did, nor understood the concepts I do now.

More ›