reidmcy

7 ms·

1.
AI unmasks anonymous chess players(science.org)
15 points by reidmcy 5y ago|2 comments
2.
by reidmcy 6y ago
Yes, the output is just a large vector with each dimension mapping to a move. But we'd probably do it as different "head" so have a small set of layers that are trained just to predict resignations. Both options would break t
3.
by reidmcy 6y ago
They're trained on everything but Bullet/HyperBullet. The neural network just predicts moves and win probabilities so we don't have a way (yet) of making it concede.
4.
by reidmcy 6y ago
We did not, we removed bullet games because they tend to be more random, and also did some filtering of the other games to remove moves made with low amounts of time remaining for the same reason. But the models don't know about differ
5.
by reidmcy 6y ago
Thanks for mentioning that. The graphs do use different dashes to distinguish the colour palletes, which are supposed to be colour blind friendly. So I thought we'd be OK. I'll take a look into adding more non-colour distinguishin
6.
by reidmcy 6y ago
Yes, that's exactly one of our goals. In the paper we even have a section on predicting which boards lead to mistakes (in general). The results were much weaker than the move prediction, but we're still working on it and will hope
7.
by reidmcy 6y ago
That's what a few machine learning people I talked too thought would happen. There are lots of examples (self driving cars being the big one) in machine learning where training on individual examples isn't enough. We were actually
8.
by reidmcy 6y ago
Hi everyone, We're happy to announce a research project that has been in the works for almost two years! Please meet Maia, a human-like neural network chess engine. Maia is a Leela-style framework that learns from human play instead of
9.
Show HN: Maia, a human-like neural network chess engine(maiachess.com)
10 points by reidmcy 6y ago|1 comments
10.
by reidmcy 6y ago
That doesn't help you prove they're indisputable from humans, even if you admitted to using them to cheat. You said some engines are indisputable from humans, can you give me some evidence of this?
11.
by reidmcy 6y ago
Thanks, those do look like they are attempting to play like humans, but neither says how that claim was tested. How would you test the their ability to imitate humans?
12.
by reidmcy 6y ago
I'm not sure if saying engines don't make long term plans is accurate, since we can set them to plan an arbitrary number of moves ahead. I think you mean that they don't have a theory of mind, and thus don't modulate the
13.
by reidmcy 6y ago
I don't think Play Magnus is close to indistinguishable, it's a modified version of Stockfish on the backend, having the same rating doesn't mean you have the same style
14.
by reidmcy 6y ago
Can you give an example? I haven't seen any that are indistinguishable from humans
15.
by reidmcy 7y ago
It's working for me, just takes a couple seconds to load
16.
by reidmcy 11y ago
SEEKING WORK - Waterloo, ON (Canada) or Remote Just graduated University of Waterloo with a degree in Mathematical Physics. I know: C++, python and OpenGL I am currently working on a python library to analysis collaboration networks of scie