Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
refulgentis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
Our AI czar, David Sacks, whined and moaned about the idea of regulation, even said Anthropic begging for some guidance was asking for “regulatory capture” and was gloating about how right he was they wanted it, 2 weeks ago. I wonder if h
92.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
You switched your claim from "they released the same chip they would have released 3 years earlier and you're stupid for thinking that was a good idea" to "I thought it was slow [because I'm hyperfocused on Apple co
93.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
> You’re equivalent of saying the Intel delays were a success too. If Trump nuked TSMC's production lines the day before M1 went to production, and the production lines came back 3 years later, would Apple ship the M1 on it? Or, the
94.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
Yes, ARM sued Qualcomm, Qualcomm won, and separately Nuvia has shipped, 2, 3? times now? I don't know how it's a failure or if the delay were "huge" and "dragged out". It's not like it launched an old prod
95.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
Something is being misunderstood, here, it’s not an iPhone crammed into a laptop in a way that requires add’l software work. A simple analogy that fits is its a MacBook with cheaper parts and a M0 series chip.
96.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
This model does image to image; whats the issue with Qwen 3 VL; is style transfer unexplained? " reference" is mentioned 11 times on the page (more specifically, I read it and it seemed to discuss it a lot)
97.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
I'm happy to give charity as a general principle, but here, we're a bit off (the comment is pointing out ~nothing changed, which is accurate)
98.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
Are they doing any normalization? I've fallen behind and assumed it just became dictator apparatus protection as long as there was flattery, i.e. tell us we're in charge and we'll let you ship oil wherever.
99.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
Love Better Call Saul :) The comparison is not even wrong (in the Pauli sense). Required knowledge seems to be DevRels role within Google culture. The absolute last thing this was was “mutiny” from a “product roadmap”. They’re sort of just
100.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
This is a good general theory, but generic and sort of reasons backwards from "actually it's not popular"
101.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
12 minute article. 70% AI. The only content not flagged? Copy and pasted PR comments. Invisible Unicode characters, triads, unnecessary markdown. Good work, obviated by bloviating. Readers dropping off near-instantly. A company leaving a sl
102.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
I understand nothing anyone says can ever convince you anything was written by AI. Not much I can say from there. shrugs So I'll just thought dump. I don't come from much and this reminds me of the rich girl who wondered how any
103.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
I'm glad all the assumptions about other people got walked back, I hope the openness about my personal situation re: AI was concrete proof why everyone identifying AI writing is not a panicking person afraid of it and starting a new
104.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
> the main problem is you can't really ever tell with a high degree of certainty This is false, it is trivial to find humans with 99%+ accuracy[1] and there is a well-known service with 99%+ accuracy when analyzed by 3rd parties wit
105.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
> "This was AI" itself has all the tells of an irrational panic which typically accompanies new technology, Being able to tell who wrote something doesn't imply irrationality, panicking, or a reaction to new technology. &g
106.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
Something feels off / sloppy with the article in general and that’s gotta be the smoking gun. I cannot think of a single case where this is true, I’ve lost 35 pounds in the last 6 months, and I’m still a medium. 5’9”.
107.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
FWIW I think for “new user” audiences you’re better off describing why we’d use this instead of IP, than why you haven’t gotten it everywhere yet: there’s a certain sort of “complaint I see the most from current users” myopia that sets in,
108.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
This paper doesn't make any sense - for background, I've maintained an AI client that's cross-platform, cross-provider, and integrates llama.cpp since 2022. I don't know why they think "agents" don't share
109.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
Thanks Claude
110.
▲
by
refulgentis
4mo ago
It's silly and a joke and a surprisingly good benchmark and don't take it seriously but don't take not taking it seriously seriously and if it's too good we use another prompt but don't actually because then it'
111.
▲
by
refulgentis
5mo ago
Nice! Just because you’re the top comment, I feel it is helpful to quick readers to point out that it has 0 to do with what happened here. :)
112.
▲
by
refulgentis
5mo ago
Using GPT-3 to translate the color science code I wrote for Google's design system from Dart to ~any language so I could get it deployed cross platform quickly, and it all worked.
113.
▲
by
refulgentis
5mo ago
I understand it. :) And you're absolutely right to point out they aren't products - I hoped that was clear - when you're building a product with them , you end up having to do the same build loop 4 times, in this instance :)
114.
▲
by
refulgentis
5mo ago
Ah, nice, ty! My excuse is those repos were added to the collection after my comment, but perhaps not :3
115.
▲
by
refulgentis
5mo ago
It's super annoying when you have products that utilize these because there's...4? releases in 3 weeks? - Gemma 4 2B/4B/27BE3B/31B - Gemma 4 2B/4B/27BE3B/31B x "assistant" / MTP drafter
116.
▲
by
refulgentis
5mo ago
@google.com'ers, there are no GGUFs (blog says there is)
117.
▲
by
refulgentis
5mo ago
I’m confused a bit, the premise they produce essentially all solar panels got an “indeed” with article-based assertions that exports doubled in one month, and it’s 14 GW more than the total amount installed in Spain ever, both very impressi
118.
▲
by
refulgentis
5mo ago
I find your agreement seductive because it side steps the unfounded assertions and simply asserts there must be something different and we don’t know it, which is easy for me to agree with too. Or maybe hard to disagree with.
119.
▲
by
refulgentis
5mo ago
This sounds like when crystal people talk quantum physics.
120.
▲
by
refulgentis
5mo ago
That is a very uncharitable read.
More ›