redeeman

33 ms·

541.
by redeeman 3y ago
> I can't even use my large MSI 1440p monitor with this computer because Linux ridiculous, Is it also fords fault I cant use an f150 because I live on a mountain without roads? You may have purchased hardware that has explicitly cho
542.
by redeeman 3y ago
yeah I see it perfectly, the stuff you want to do is protected by divine power, but the stuff others do, not so much. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150402-the-worst-place-... "toxic, nightmarish lake c
543.
by redeeman 3y ago
your fancy electronics devices have polluted this earth during their manufacture, and most certainly will during their probable end of life in a landfill. Who gives you the right to say that this is okay but an SUV is not? what if I want to
544.
by redeeman 3y ago
im unsure what that has to do with anything.. what happened to the old device?
545.
by redeeman 3y ago
> Because Linus is more pragmatic than RMS. he probably is, but that is not the reason here. even RMS fully agrees that using it in the normal USING fashion does not trigger copyleft. This is why you can compile proprietary software with
546.
by redeeman 3y ago
> Many people do purely use these cars for no purpose besides them being a status symbol, or to be more secure on the road (which could be suggestive of a non-confident or bad driver). In the same way me configuring which interfaces to b
547.
by redeeman 3y ago
and you probably use an extremely overpowered device for checking your email, but perhaps you also use it to do other things?
548.
by redeeman 3y ago
well yeah sure, they lived, they used what they had. we also lived with computers of the 90ies, 00s, did mostly same things, Wanna go back? You want them to limit themselves to the equivelant in car tech
549.
by redeeman 3y ago
> How many residential appliances benefit from three phase, and is the benefit outweighed by the additional cost of more copper for the additional wires? due to the higher voltage in europe, conductors tend to be quite a bit thinner than
550.
by redeeman 3y ago
I dont agree that calling someone ignorant is a personal attack, or name-calling for that matter. if I had said "you're an idiot" it would be different, but ignorant is a fairly polite language, that somewhat distances from t
551.
by redeeman 3y ago
and yet it probably would not have been "force majeure" if it had gone the other way
552.
by redeeman 3y ago
they have atleast ensured a great many people are dealing with regularly patching crap, and taking care of fallout, from what is arguably one of the most insecure piles of garbage EVER WRITTEN
553.
by redeeman 3y ago
now it will just be a biological algorithm instead :)
554.
by redeeman 3y ago
> This doesn't sound like protecting the users and more like protecting the governments. What Harmful means routinely aligns with the powerful políticas and corporations and not people. I'm usually worried about how "prote
555.
by redeeman 3y ago
> As for cost, it's cheaper (for me) to store my data in the cloud, than the cost of electricity required to run my NAS. how much data are we talking about?
556.
by redeeman 3y ago
to sibling: > They were some of the most professional, conscientious, diligent, and excellent technologists I've ever worked with. Definitely on par with anyone at FAANGs or startups that I've work in. such a shame they choose
557.
by redeeman 3y ago
> Prosecutors have to prove you willfully and knowingly told a falsehood. No, they have to make someone else believe you did. How else would this burden of proof be lifted? some form of brain scan that can just say "yeah, he willful
558.
by redeeman 3y ago
what happened to "sticks and stones..." ? it seems to me that we've gone from "being lynched randomly is harmful to people" into "someone being a moron calling slurs is harmful". Imagine how terrible it wi
559.
by redeeman 3y ago
sure, if a country wants to try pull in more, they could. Sounds to me like its the Japanese that wants it most though
560.
by redeeman 3y ago
> Lack of English skills if only there was some way to remedy this.
561.
by redeeman 3y ago
no, openai had an army of people to classify things
562.
by redeeman 3y ago
all the way until it isnt. I strongly think that many people are cheering for the pendulum to be pulled sooo far to one direction, that they will have a total chock when it inevitably goes the other direction again
563.
by redeeman 3y ago
unfortunately it seems a great many tech people are cowards and just goes along with all the BS. They have to collect a paycheck after all.
564.
by redeeman 3y ago
yeah, I do agree that it was very reprehensible of trump to tell people to go home and be peaceful. I mean, how incompetent can he be? he spends all the effort scheming and plotting to illegitimately take over the government, capture the ca
565.
by redeeman 3y ago
you clearly do not understand what he was writing
566.
by redeeman 3y ago
I sincerely hope we are
567.
by redeeman 3y ago
its almost as if true motives does not have to be equal to claimed motives. With some slightly different lenses on here, it makes sense.
568.
by redeeman 3y ago
if everyone has it, it ceases to have any significance, and can be ignored. this is why someone might have been called "johnny 1 leg", because he only had one leg. You do not hear things like "2 legs 2 arms 10 fingers 1 heart
569.
by redeeman 3y ago
at no point did I suggest we should not believe someone when they say their name. But what purpose is a complete unit in a name if it is what 1/2 of everyone else in a country has too? the icelandic case is different, as it does after
570.
by redeeman 3y ago
thought: when half the country has a "muhammed" appendage to their name, what does it even mean? and might it perhaps be time to just not consider it as such?

More ›