> This doesn't sound like protecting the users and more like protecting the governments. What Harmful means routinely aligns with the powerful políticas and cor

> This doesn't sound like protecting the users and more like protecting the governments. What Harmful means routinely aligns with the powerful políticas and corporations and not people. I'm usually worried about how "protection of people/children" is used to restrict choice. that is of course what it is. If you say or imply anything that is even one iota against the official narrative you must under all circumstances consume, believe, spread, it will be considered "harmful" at the least. But dont worry, the blessed politicians, authorities, and talking heads on TV that tell you what to do and think, they will be exempt, so that they can continue to speak the absolute truth one day, and a few weeks later, the current truth (that directly contradicts previous) will both be true! no. as with many things, the ones who screams "misinformation", "harmful" the loudest, are generally the ones lying, distorting, twisting, and doing misinformation attempts. "I am from the government and I am here to help (tell you what the absolute truth is) (and if you disagree, we will crush you, unperson you) (and if you, over there, do ANYTHING to help these other guys think otherwise, we will fine you out of the market)"