redbar0n

23 ms·

211.
by redbar0n 4y ago
I’m sympathetic to both Clojure and Elixir (or Gleam), but for easing into FP then I’d start with F# (or ReScript), just because they are both in the OCaml family of languages (best in class for pragmatic typed FP), and because of everythin
212.
by redbar0n 4y ago
yes, apparently it did…
213.
by redbar0n 4y ago
Oh, so science institutionalizes a practise of humility, you mean..? Current article notwithstanding, of course…
214.
by redbar0n 4y ago
Even science is not precluded from dogmatic thinking. Dogmas are everywhere, not merely within religion. In science it’s merely framed as «paradigms». This story details how it looks.
215.
by redbar0n 4y ago
How do the states diverge? I think you can have a two-way binding with a controlled update procedure, akin to one-way data-binding. I’ve read some people claim to do it by producing a kind of one-way directionality under-the-hood (?) from t
216.
by redbar0n 4y ago
that’s how it works, but you also need to attach event handlers and set up the state for the framework on the client-side (for subsequent interactions).
217.
by redbar0n 4y ago
> Hydration in the current sense is re-running most of what the server already did, to recreate the runtime state it already had. It’s interesting that the problems with hydration is in some sense caused by the insistence on one-way data
218.
by redbar0n 4y ago
Goes to reason that you’d need some hydration on an island.
219.
by redbar0n 4y ago
security by obscurity, that worked.
220.
by redbar0n 4y ago
Yup. It’s basically a slightly altered version of The Curse of Cassandra: the prophet/oracle who was correct but not believed. «Cassandra was a Trojan priestess of Apollo in Greek mythology cursed to utter true prophecies, but never to
221.
by redbar0n 4y ago
> I forever wonder when the technical naked short options[0] will get called, but they never have in a serious way. What does «called» mean in this analogy? That the subsystem doesn’t go away? So your experience is that: Stuff tends to s
222.
by redbar0n 4y ago
Thought it was a post arguing AGAINST Systems Thinkers. Was slighlty provoked and curious to read it, since I’m a fan of systems thinking. Found out it was arguing FOR Systems Thinkers…
223.
by redbar0n 4y ago
The naming of TypeScript Union and Intersection types, with respects to type theory, used to be terribly confusing/contradictory: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/unions-and-inte... See last parag
224.
by redbar0n 5y ago
It is correct, except I think the browser generates the DOM from the HTML, and the JS just attaches event handlers to it. The reason for the double work is that the context here is SSR/SSG: «The re-execution of code on the client that
225.
by redbar0n 5y ago
An upgrade shouldn’t be a downgrade. But too often it is. It breaks expectations and ruins trust. Soon, users learn, and in response turn off all upgrades by default. Success? If an upgrade breaks things then it should be made exceedingly e
226.
by redbar0n 5y ago
Cause: The Curse of Expertise - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_knowledge
227.
by redbar0n 5y ago
> You're still approaching this as "A's feelings vs B's rationale". Not necessarily. I also wrote: «If one part obviously feels so much _stronger_ than the other, why shouldn’t the other just give way? … some pe
228.
by redbar0n 5y ago
It was not so much a question on _who_ is going to win, as to _what_ is going to win. In other words: What are deemed legitimate criteria, and even the most important criteria, in a conflict? It’s a question of value systems. Making feeling
229.
by redbar0n 5y ago
Reminds me of the transformational question: «Do you want to be right, or do you want to have a relationship?»
230.
by redbar0n 5y ago
To be fair, it’s not really about coldly «saying something is important». I think the question is really better restated as: What if one person just feels more strongly about things (most or all of the time)? Should feelings always trump? S
231.
by redbar0n 5y ago
I think the reason the author wasn’t _hearing it_ was that what she said didn’t make _sense_ to him. He couldn’t see the rationality of her argument (ratio = proportion), evidenced by his estimation that her reaction was wildly disproportio
232.
by redbar0n 5y ago
wow, that's a weird limitation. The README says: "SSR is currently disabled for the Next.js app as the app will be fully client-side rendered for iOS and Android. This is a limitation we are working to address in a future update.&
233.
by redbar0n 5y ago
It's about using a single codebase ("write once, run anywhere"), that can use React Native on native and NextJS on the web. Solito is the abstraction that allows using the same navigation abstraction for native and web.
234.
by redbar0n 5y ago
mad props to Fernando Rojo for not only creating these libraries, but also for solidly documenting them (including his journey and rationale)!
235.
by redbar0n 5y ago
at the expense of search discoverability?
236.
by redbar0n 5y ago
looking forward to Arturito ;D
237.
by redbar0n 5y ago
> And the likelihood of your password leaking tends to be dependent on factors you control. Do you mean if you reuse the same password(s)? > But that still doesn't mean forced regular password rotation makes you safer. Would you
238.
by redbar0n 5y ago
How do you know if the password has been breached? More than not, you don’t. Hence, change password rutinely. That’s the logic, I presume.
239.
by redbar0n 5y ago
> You can't even go outside in the sun anymore Perfectly describes the hero programmer stuck in the rabbit hole.
240.
by redbar0n 5y ago
FWIW: It didn't come across as bitter to me. More like a general warning from a hardened battle hero. A warning that many naive young recruits ought to give credence to, before it's too late (when the cost has been sunk, and you&#

More ›