> You're still approaching this as "A's feelings vs B's rationale". Not necessarily. I also wrote: «If one part obviously feels so much _stronger_ than the ot

> You're still approaching this as "A's feelings vs B's rationale". Not necessarily. I also wrote: «If one part obviously feels so much _stronger_ than the other, why shouldn’t the other just give way? … some people tend to feel _more strongly_ about most things, and others may not feel particularly strong about anything (although _they are not void of feelings/opinions_).» I’m thinking about the degree of feelings involved. (No one is fully and solely rational, after all.) I agree with you on the other points you make.