recibe

9 ms·

1.
Codeception webdriver with phantomjs spawned with grunt(darrennolan.com)
1 points by recibe 12y ago|0 comments
2.
by recibe 12y ago
He didn't want to participate in the building of the atom bomb. Hero.
3.
by recibe 12y ago
The Chinese are tired of being paid a fraction of what citizens in developed countries make for doing the same work. This is a blog about how a citizen in a developed country is "shocked" at the concept that other people should be
4.
by recibe 12y ago
Ross made the decision, now Ross pays the price. Lots of people could have done this, and lots of people were smart enough not to.
5.
by recibe 12y ago
Just because you perceive something makes the world "more fair" doesn't mean it should EVER be implemented exclusively on that basis.
6.
by recibe 12y ago
Great source. The growth rate is slowing as the population is increasing. Stop a moment to consider how that observation is irrelevant.
7.
by recibe 12y ago
That's both flimsy and a perversion of my logic, which is a direct rebuttal of the logic of the article itself. The article gives an example of a woman who tried 7 times to have children and failed because she is genetically defective
8.
by recibe 12y ago
I had a similar experience - but never said anything about "bombs" and thus wasn't taken to jail. I just tried to complain about one of the inspectors making a smartassed remark to me when I went through was forced to wait fo
9.
by recibe 12y ago
From the article: "The method, which was developed in Newcastle, should help women like Sharon Bernardi, from Sunderland, who lost all seven of her children to mitochondrial disease." Reasoning: Sharon Bernardi hasn't been ab
10.
by recibe 12y ago
Its not sensational because of the clickbait title. It is sensational because it is an example of the state sanctioning the customization of human eggs and embryos - which is a pivot of public policy that creates vast consequences.
11.
by recibe 12y ago
Not really. This procedure is likely to be inaccessible to the general public without subsidy via insurance (public or private). My argument is that one's ability to reproduce should not be guaranteed by the state, and therefore the st
12.
by recibe 12y ago
excellent remark.
13.
by recibe 12y ago
Opposition is also from those who don't think that human reproduction is a moral imperative to be guaranteed by the state - under the fallacy that it somehow increases our collective quality of life. Like me.
14.
by recibe 12y ago
Based on what? Your opinion? The U.N. projects world population to increase to 10.8 billion by 2100 from 6.9 billion in 2010. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publication... The academic