re6fae5Wied5tha

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by re6fae5Wied5tha 5y ago

   There's no reason to drill for this, and 6 miles down at 1000C presets less than ideal operating conditions for a turbine. Any peak over about 2000ft should be sufficient for an atmospheric water generation plant to produce enough wate
2. 2.▲
   by re6fae5Wied5tha 5y ago

   This is actually the risk I came here to mention about deep bores. Bore first, build later, otherwise you may be the unlucky winner of a fluid formation trapped under a rigid formation in the local geology. https://theconversatio
3. 3.▲
   by re6fae5Wied5tha 5y ago

   I can't imagine it takes more than a few circuits of water through the bore to recover all of the energy, the static column of water alone would contain a non-trivial fraction of the energy required to drill the bore after equilibratin
4. 4.▲
   by re6fae5Wied5tha 5y ago

   > Is there any conceivable burden urbanites don't imagine the people and land outside urban areas can tolerate? The burden of wealth.
5. 5.▲
   by re6fae5Wied5tha 5y ago

   Good luck leaving just about any country when virtually the entire world wipes bum with the UN Charter on Human Rights and restricts freedom of movement in violation of Article 13.
6. 6.▲
   by re6fae5Wied5tha 5y ago

   > They can’t innovate because innovative type people weren’t let into the company. I am starting to think this is a broader trend in human societies and is probably the primary failure mode of human enterprise more broadly. People who ar