re-thc

8 ms·

121.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> This is an open source project, not a F500 company. Vercel?
122.
by re-thc 3mo ago
No, quoting the article: > only really suits prototyping and low-volume runs rather than high-volume production at commercial foundries
123.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> why suddenly everyone is rushing to adopt Base UI instead of Radix MUI (who started Base UI) hired the Radix "original" developers and they were pushing that as it being Radix v2.
124.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> There is a scale between prise-sensitivity and risk-averseness, from my point of reference large companies are much more risk-averse than they are price sensitive. That's not true. It's just the way things work "saving m
125.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> At some point it's inevitable to just rubber stamp whatever is coming from AI. To make it worse? AI and even Fable can make things +50% and then -50% in different places. You can trade 1 bug for another. So just "rubber stamp
126.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> I agree with the take not to bother with a sophisticated memory system. Anything worth remembering should be in docs, guides, source comments, commit messages or tickets. You don't need another layer That is a sophisticated memory
127.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> Something about this idea really resonates with certain personality types. Like ancient people? Because "new oil" whilst I get what it might imply sounds bad to me. Oil has been superseded in many places so "new oil&quot
128.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> how can they still use claude? Workarounds aside, it says Claude Code not Claude. i.e. they are using the CLI running any model. You can for instance run GLM with it.
129.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> I think they should find a better name for this project. Need another plus? Vite++
130.
by re-thc 3mo ago
So just arguing over semantics? Then you want R (real) AGI? I mean it was AI before and now AGI...
131.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> Surely all the time is taken by the tests, not calling the test functions? Calling tests has overhead. Also knowing how to schedule and parallelize tests with dependencies is not as "simple".
132.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> It seems like Zuck refused to accept owning a boring ad business Zuck sees a real problem: not owning the platform. Hence the VR and other attempts. He sees what he has today as a dead end. The fear grips him. In theory Google and Appl
133.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> xAI has shown this to be quite lucrative Come back when you have actual numbers on dollars spent, interest rates and the time spent.
134.
by re-thc 3mo ago
Qualcomm aims to sue and monopolize so no sharing is caring for them. They want control.
135.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> who are these people and what makes them more qualified than any of you Anyone can run something and make a web page. These people just do it instead of questioning. Main difference. If everyone asks "how could you" "are
136.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> It's so good at taking underspecified requirements and filling in the gaps with sensible approaches for your project. At a high level. It misses low level or other non-functional requirements differently so I wouldn't say Opu
137.
by re-thc 3mo ago
Another one bites the dust? After SpaceX (xAI), now Meta can't find better ways to make revenue than selling raw inference... Hardware makers win.
138.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> And Opus 4.8 is still cheaper for a higher pass rate Unless it spams as much as Opus, I doubt it. Opus 4.8 literally spams text like puke. On a longer run especially if you get cache misses here and there the bulk of the cost is all th
139.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> And how many projects are actually doing this? How many are following any best practices? Whose problem is that? Not AI. > And if they are, how many are keeping this up to date? And how many projects use the latest Spring (mentioned
140.
by re-thc 3mo ago
Just fighting nonsense with nonsense. Is Mythos / Fable good: yes Is it 10x better: no So this special "Mythos" class especially in security -- what does it even mean? Is it ChatGPT 10 class? i.e. it is just marketing. What d
141.
by re-thc 3mo ago
No. Just create your own guardrails. Lint rules. Hooks. Whatever. AI also keeps training on newer data. We move on.
142.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> Apollo Group has $1T assets under management, I believe them over most folks on HN If only that's a measure of if they know how to time the stock market. The real measure is how much they earn not if their sales or marketing depar
143.
by re-thc 3mo ago
It is less that the Mag 7 is starting to underperform and more that a market correction is likely and coming very soon.
144.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> I wonder if this bug was found via project glasswing Did you read how they said it took weeks? Would run out of tokens at that rate...
145.
by re-thc 3mo ago
Isn't this already Rust?
146.
by re-thc 3mo ago
Is this on AMD? I wonder if it's all to do with NUMA or their CCD architecture etc (well these days Intel and everyone also does it to some extent).
147.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> most halfway decent models can write damn good code for a fraction of the price The problem isn't what they do in a blank state. It is how they get there and the edge cases. Some models also take longer (uses more steps) i.e. end
148.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> It's interesting that Meta is heavily using Google's models (as opposed to Anthropic or OpenAI) Who says they aren't? Could be using all of them for "research".
149.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> How do you stop a human from reading one of your files? Call the police!
150.
by re-thc 3mo ago
> Chinese labs are also still behind, so they’re incentivized to collaborate and have no reason to do it in private. Even if they're ahead they don't have enough GPUs to scale. Open sourcing is hence a good strategy to at least

More ›