4 ms·
> It's so good at taking underspecified requirements and filling in the gaps with sensible approaches for your project. At a high level. It misses low level or
by re-thc 3mo ago
> It's so good at taking underspecified requirements and filling in the gaps with sensible approaches for your project.
At a high level. It misses low level or other non-functional requirements differently so I wouldn't say Opus is just strictly better.
It's also possible that it's just a harness problem more than model.
- e9 3mo agoI agree with you on the harness. I find that Claude can be good in any harness but GPT is only superior inside Codex.