re-thc

12 ms·

301.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> Yet, somehow, in Java land, this is still the norm in 2026? FFM (what this article refers to) was released some releases ago. So what is the issue? If you mean what 3rd party libraries use - is that a concern to you? That's like s
302.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> because in many enterprise applications you do not need high performance Looking at and having looked at some of their cloud spend etc, nah. To be more specific there's a lot of fat. Whether that's HFT style high performance
303.
by re-thc 7mo ago
Ask Codex how to filter it!
304.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> most of which seem tuned to cheating benchmarks The fix would have been requiring tests to catch the cheating. There were suggestions but it didn't happen. It was definitely possible to catch not having sent date headers (or cachi
305.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> Now AI just writes document.getElementById('longVariableName') javascript and straight SQL without complaining at all I got a newer model that bypasses all that. It takes out Wireshark and send bytes straight.
306.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> I can do that in a weekend, which is also probably true for Deno anyway You can build Deno or even Deno deploy in a weekend? Even AI can't (not properly). 1. People say things all the time especially online. They might even tweet
307.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> devs nowadays aren't willing to pay for development tooling I can't speak generally because it varies but is this really the case here? Other posters have commented on missing features and issues with their product i.e. Deno
308.
by re-thc 7mo ago
A lot of the leaders of that century have been going downhill, ever since, e.g. top Japanese manufacturers.
309.
by re-thc 7mo ago
Mistral Small 4 is already announced.
310.
by re-thc 7mo ago
If you know what you are doing are you still vibe coding? A lot of these vibe coded projects even have AI respond to you on any questions or issues ie no one knows what’s going on.
311.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> If AI is AI That "AI" got renamed to "AGI"
312.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> The “I” in “AI” stands for “intelligence” By that logic the “I” in Siri is 2x more intelligent.
313.
by re-thc 7mo ago
Nothing. You asked OR not AND. OR = other(s) can take over.
314.
by re-thc 7mo ago
They run Nvidia and Huawei for example. And mine was just an example.
315.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> they are setting up in Singapore as their base Europe in general has been tightening up their rules / taxes / laws around startups / companies especially tech and remote. It's been less friendly. these days.
316.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> Both Amazon and Google serve Opus at roughly ~1/2 the speed of the chinese models We were responded about 10x not 0.5x. x86 vs arm64 could have different performance. The Chinese models could be optimized for different hardware so
317.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> with claimed data center locations (according to OpenRouter) in the US or Singapore and only the devs in China They just have a China only endpoint and likely a company under a different name. Nothing to do with AI. TikTok is similar (
318.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> but an 5x efficiency gain in a single generation feels like its too much, especially considering how newer process nodes have been yielding less and less improvements The efficiency is in other areas too e.g. memory, network, etc. It&#
319.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> unless China is pumping out domestic chips cheaply enough They are. Nvidia makes A LOT of profit. Hey, top stock for a reason. > I wouldn't be surprised if things like DS were trained and now hosted on Nvidia hardware DS is &q
320.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> That's a tautology. People think chinese models are 10x more efficient because they're 10x cheaper They do have different infrastructure / electricity costs and they might not run on nvidia hardware. It's not just t
321.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> I'll take a commit authored by someone else and then git amend the author to myself, did I write that commit then I did say co-author didn't I? Even if you added 0.000000001% to something you did so technically, yes. > By
322.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> Blanchard is very clear that he didn't write a single line of code He used Claude to write it. Difference? The fact that I write on the notepad vs printed it out = I didn't do it? > Signing GitHub commit doesn't chang
323.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> What he claimed, and what was interesting, was that Claude didn't look at the code Who opened the PR? Who co-authored the commits? It's clearly on Github. > Blanchard was a chardet maintainer for years. Of course he had lo
324.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> What AI are eroding is copyright. At the moment it's people that are eroding copyright. E.g. in this case someone did something. "AI" didn't have a brain, woke up and suddenly decided to do it. Realistically nothing
325.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> This feels sort of like saying "I just blindly threw paint at that canvas on the wall and > He fed only the API and the test suite to Claude and asked it Difference being Claude looked; so not blind. The equivalent is more like
326.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> because a great deal of writers have described the process of writing in detail And that's often inaccurate - just as much as asking startup founders how they came to be. Part of it is forgot, part of it is don't know how to
327.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> but we created MCP. Now we're wrapping MCP into CLIs... Next we'll wrap the CLIs into MCPs.
328.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> One CTO said their board explicitly asked "why do we need humans writing code when agents ship faster with zero complaints" Because all the humans were fired? Zero complaints where? News articles have been showing plenty of A
329.
by re-thc 7mo ago
5.2 and 5.2 Codex is arguably the same gen.
330.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> but as the cost of fixing them trends towards $0 It’s not. In a proper org the cost is the testing, the release process, the coordination, the planning, etc. Any scope creep even if it fixes something often gets shouted at.

More ›