re-thc

16 ms·

331.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> They claim their (best) devs don't even code anymore No, they claimed they didn’t code during a time period. Around year end until early this year. Technically they could have just been on leave. Also best dev = principal / s
332.
by re-thc 7mo ago
> Work is freezing hiring and upping spending on tokens for everyone. Doesn't mean the two are related. Is AI just the excuse? We've got tariffs, war, uncertainty and other drama non stop.
333.
by re-thc 8mo ago
It's a trade off. Hyperthreading takes up space on the die and the power budget. As to E core itself - it's ARM's playbook.
334.
by re-thc 8mo ago
Next is the fps of an AI playing Crysis.
335.
by re-thc 8mo ago
It should load instantly.
336.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> titles (within "tech" in particular) are almost completely arbitrary It wasn't like that some years ago. Senior back in the days is probably your lead / staff of today. The problem isn't just the companies but
337.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> 90%+ of the engineers at Big Tech and the technorati startups The US 1s? Is that why we have Deepseek and then other non-US open source LLMs catching up rapidly? World view please. The developer community is not US only.
338.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> Remains to be seen how capable it actually is. It's the best. We all turned it off. 100% privacy.
339.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> It came with Windows preinstalled, but I immediately wiped that to install linux. Do you really need Openclaw now? And not claude code + zapier or Claude code + cron? That's the point. If you have worse CPU and GPU Windows will be
340.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> It did change. They bumped $200 on the entire line. I wonder if that would happen regardless of RAM, e.g. for tariffs etc.
341.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> Aren't the OpenClaw enjoyers buying Mac Minis because it's the cheapest thing which runs macOS That's likely only part of the reason. Mac Mini is now "cheap" because everyone exploded in price. RAM and SSD etc
342.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> Does it? Market looks like it'll be harder for consumers Yes. I never specifically talked about consumers only though.
343.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> Plus Go compilation speed/test running provides quick iteration for LLMs How is Java slow in any of these? Plenty of tricks e.g. AppCDS before the tests.
344.
by re-thc 8mo ago
What’s the depreciation on that RTX 6000 though? New hardware keeps on coming with large gains in performance.
345.
by re-thc 8mo ago
They have some? Aren’t Oracle and other “friends” running it?
346.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> I can't see how this helps an LLM. Your examples aren’t language specific though. I doubt English doesn’t have words that have twisted meanings now.
347.
by re-thc 8mo ago
That’s not what Nvidia is doing. AMD originally went all in on what you call GPU. It was great for gaming. Not as much for inference. Nvidia whilst still making it GPU tuned the architecture for AI workloads. Gaming hasn’t improved as much
348.
by re-thc 8mo ago
Serena eats context for lunch (and dinner).
349.
by re-thc 8mo ago
It’s not enabled by default because there are still bugs eg race condition issues. Check on GitHub.
350.
by re-thc 8mo ago
How does this compare to GitHub? Are there benchmarks? If the problem is performance how much has it improved?
351.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> he was replacing his entire customer service team with Claude Code, an AI tool that can write and deploy software on its own Right. So it clearly has nothing to do with AI. You didn't keep the customer service manager or someone k
352.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> Is anyone able to explain why it's so much slower when solid state doesn't really care about the data location? It does. Just differently. E.g. a lot of SSDs nowadays cheap out and save money by using slower and poorer qualit
353.
by re-thc 8mo ago
I assume junior devs can at least search. AI often doesn't even do that. That's why there are things like context7, which in a narrow context helps but not perfect. There are lots of ambiguous situations where a search and human &
354.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> To overcome this problem model needs specialized training, that I don‘t think the industry knows how to approach We already have coding tuned models i.e. Codex. We should just have language / technology specific models with a focu
355.
by re-thc 8mo ago
Sounds like neither. More like throw a dice and press the up button.
356.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> The earth has always been earth-shaped. And you never needed more than 640KB of RAM [1] right? Your "statement" is based on your knowledge today. You'd be burned for witchcraft back in the days for saying the earth was n
357.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> They generate code that’ll get a positive result at any cost, even if it’s horrible in efficient. If only efficiency is the only problem with that. Sometimes an error state should an error. This is the equivalent of eating all exceptio
358.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> Why does OpenClaw have 800,000+ lines of code?? Because I write like this -- signed AI
359.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> you may think you own the data you work on, but you don’t It's called <open>AI.
360.
by re-thc 8mo ago
> That can´t be it. By that statement if I belive that I can fly that would not be the "Truth". 1st what is to fly? You've already made assumptions i.e. beliefs elsewhere. You can definitely fly. Try it on a cliff. You mig

More ›